EFFECT OF TELE-REHABILITATION IN BREAKING BARRIERS WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS IN RURAL AREAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/0fh82p65Keywords:
Quality of life, Activities of Daily Living, Digital Health, Functional Mobility, Rehabilitation, Rural Health Services, TelemedicineAbstract
Background: Limited access to conventional rehabilitation services in rural areas often leads to persistent mobility impairments and reduced functional independence. Tele-rehabilitation has emerged as a promising solution, offering remote therapy through digital platforms. By addressing geographic and infrastructural barriers, it enables continuity of care for underserved populations. This study evaluates the clinical effectiveness of a structured tele-rehabilitation program in improving functional outcomes and quality of life in mobility-impaired individuals from rural Pakistan.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of an 8-week structured tele-rehabilitation program versus standard care in enhancing mobility, functional independence, and quality of life among rural individuals with mobility limitations.
Methods: A multicenter, assessor-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted with 92 participants (n=46 in each group) aged 34–65 years, residing in rural regions of Pakistan. The intervention group underwent an 8-week home-based tele-rehabilitation program involving two in-person assessments, four structured teleconsultations, and biweekly motivational SMS messages. Exercises targeted upper and lower limb mobility, balance, coordination, and ambulation. The control group received routine post-discharge care with monthly check-ins. Primary outcomes included the Barrier to Care Questionnaire, Berg Balance Scale, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes assessed quality of life (QOL). Normality was confirmed via Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p>0.05), and data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and t-tests.
Results: The intervention group demonstrated significant improvements across all metrics (p<0.001): QOL scores increased by 15.8 points, barrier scores reduced by 1.6 points, Berg Balance scores improved by 16.5 points, and FIM scores rose by 28.2 points. Control group changes were minimal and statistically non-significant.
Conclusion: Tele-rehabilitation significantly enhances functional mobility, independence, and quality of life for individuals in rural settings. While effective, its scalability depends on resolving digital access issues and promoting sustained patient engagement.
References
Bilwani S, Anjum G. Gender differences in making moral decisions: the ethics of care perspective in Pakistan. Ethics and social welfare. 2022;16(1):73-89.
Alexander M. Telerehabilitation, E-Book: Principles and Practice: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021.
Chen S-C, Lin C-H, Su S-W, Chang Y-T, Lai C-H. Feasibility and effect of interactive telerehabilitation on balance in individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2021;18:1-11.
Rasheed A, Shahid Z. EFFECT OF TELE-REHABILITATION IN BREAKING BARRIERS WITH MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS IN RURAL AREAS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation. 2025;3(2 (Health & Allied)):8-14.
Seron P, Oliveros M-J, Gutierrez-Arias R, Fuentes-Aspe R, Torres-Castro RC, Merino-Osorio C, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: a rapid overview. Physical therapy. 2021;101(6):pzab053.
Wang X, Wu T, Fei B, Li X, Tang Y, Zheng Y, et al. Access barriers to care for patients with silent cerebrovascular disease (SCD) in rural China: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Clinical eHealth. 2023;6:10-6.
Shaw MT, Best P, Frontario A, Charvet LE. Telerehabilitation benefits patients with multiple sclerosis in an urban setting. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2021;27(1):39-45.
Oshomoji O, Ajiroba J, Semudara S, Olayemi M. Tele-rehabilitation in African rural areas: a systematic review. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2024;29(1):89.
Padmavathi J, Gandhi S, Siva Kumar T. Systematic review on end-users’ perception of facilitators and barriers in accessing tele-rehabilitation services. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health. 2023;10(3):377-88.
Erturan S, Burak M, Elbasan B. Breaking barriers: exploring physiotherapists’ willingness and challenges in embracing telerehabilitation in a developing country. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971-). 2024;193(3):1359-67.
Krishnan G. Telerehabilitation: an overview. Telehealth and Medicine Today. 2021;6(4).
Garg D, Majumdar R, Chauhan S, Preenja R, Parihar J, Saluja A, et al. Teleneurorehabilitation among person with Parkinson's disease in India: The initial experience and barriers to implementation. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2021;24(4):536-41.
Vuori M. Digital Rehabilitation Interventions at Home-and Life Space in Sub-Saharan Africa: Scoping review. 2025.
Aktar A. Experience of parents of children with autism spectrum disorder regarding the tele-rehabilitation service in the selected schools of children with autism during COVID-19: Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University …; 2021.
Turolla A, Rossettini G, Viceconti A, Palese A, Geri T. Musculoskeletal physical therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: is telerehabilitation the answer? Physical therapy. 2020;100(8):1260-4.
Maresca G, Maggio MG, De Luca R, Manuli A, Tonin P, Pignolo L, et al. Tele-neuro-rehabilitation in Italy: state of the art and future perspectives. Frontiers in neurology. 2020;11:563375.
Hale-Gallardo JL, Kreider CM, Jia H, Castaneda G, Freytes IM, Cowper Ripley DC, et al. Telerehabilitation for rural veterans: a qualitative assessment of barriers and facilitators to implementation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2020:559-70.
Ahonle ZJ, Kreider CM, Hale-Gallardo J, Castaneda G, Findley K, Ottomanelli L, et al. Implementation and use of video tele-technologies in delivery of individualized community-based vocational rehabilitation services to rural veterans. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2021;55(2):227-33.
Knepley KD, Mao JZ, Wieczorek P, Okoye FO, Jain AP, Harel NY. Impact of telerehabilitation for stroke-related deficits. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27(3):239-46.
Surya N, Someshwar HP. Low-Cost telerehabilitation in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs): Overcoming barriers to access and improving healthcare delivery. NeuroRehabilitation. 2025:10538135241303349.
Sekhon H, Sekhon K, Launay C, Afililo M, Innocente N, Vahia I, et al. Telemedicine and the rural dementia population: A systematic review. Maturitas. 2021;143:105-14.
Butzner M, Cuffee Y. Telehealth Interventions and Outcomes Across Rural Communities in the United States: Narrative Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(8):e29575.
Waibel KH, Perry TT. Telehealth and Allergy Services in Rural and Regional Locations That Lack Specialty Services. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022;10(10):2507-13.e1.
Dhediya R, Chadha M, Bhattacharya AD, Godbole S, Godbole S. Role of Telemedicine in Diabetes Management. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023;17(3):775-81.
Tsou C, Robinson S, Boyd J, Jamieson A, Blakeman R, Yeung J, et al. Effectiveness of Telehealth in Rural and Remote Emergency Departments: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(11):e30632.
Maganty A, Byrnes ME, Hamm M, Wasilko R, Sabik LM, Davies BJ, et al. Barriers to rural health care from the provider perspective. Rural Remote Health. 2023;23(2):7769.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aqsa Rasheed , Zohaib Shahid (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
