IMPACT OF CONSTRAINT-INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY (CIMT) VS. ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC (EMG) BIOFEEDBACK ON UPPER LIMB MOTOR RELEARNING IN CEREBRAL PALSY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/q638ph32Keywords:
cerebral palsy, constraint-induced movement therapy , Electromyography, Hemiplegia, Motor Skills, , Rehabilitation, ChildAbstract
Background: Upper limb motor impairments in children with cerebral palsy (CP), particularly hemiplegic types, limit functional independence and reduce quality of life. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Electromyographic (EMG) Biofeedback are two evidence-based rehabilitative approaches that aim to improve motor outcomes. CIMT facilitates cortical reorganization through intensive, task-specific training of the affected limb, while EMG Biofeedback supports motor learning via real-time visual or auditory feedback on muscle activation. Comparative evidence regarding their effectiveness in pediatric CP remains sparse.
Objective: To compare the effects of CIMT and EMG Biofeedback on upper limb motor function, spasticity, and functional hand use in children with spastic hemiplegic CP.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary pediatric rehabilitation center involving 60 children aged 6–12 years with spastic hemiplegic CP (GMFCS Levels I–III). Participants were randomized into two groups: CIMT (n = 30) and EMG Biofeedback (n = 30). Both groups received 2-hour sessions, 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The CIMT protocol included mitt restraint and task-specific training, while the EMG group received guided selective muscle activation training using surface electrodes. Primary outcomes were the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MA2), Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA). Evaluations were conducted at baseline and after 4 weeks.
Results: At baseline, no significant differences were observed between groups (p > 0.05). Post-intervention, the CIMT group demonstrated greater improvements in MA2 scores (52.3 ± 6.8 to 71.2 ± 7.4) compared to EMG Biofeedback (51.9 ± 7.2 to 61.8 ± 8.1; p < 0.001). Spasticity reduced more in CIMT (MAS mean change: −1.5 ± 0.6) than EMG (−0.8 ± 0.5; p < 0.001). AHA scores improved significantly in the CIMT group (45.6 ± 5.5 to 62.3 ± 6.1) versus the EMG group (45.2 ± 5.9 to 54.8 ± 6.7; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: CIMT resulted in significantly greater improvements in upper limb function, spasticity reduction, and hand use than EMG Biofeedback. These findings support prioritizing CIMT as a primary rehabilitation strategy in children with hemiplegic CP, with EMG Biofeedback as a supplementary option when CIMT is not feasible.
References
Goodwin BM, Sabelhaus EK, Pan YC, Bjornson KF, Pham KLD, Walker WO, et al. Accelerometer Measurements Indicate That Arm Movements of Children With Cerebral Palsy Do Not Increase After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT). Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(5):7405205100p1-p9.
Shih TY, Wang TN, Shieh JY, Lin SY, Ruan SJ, Tang HH, et al. Comparative effects of kinect-based versus therapist-based constraint-induced movement therapy on motor control and daily motor function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):13.
Bingöl H, Günel MK. Comparing the effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual training in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy mainstreamed in regular school: A randomized controlled study. Arch Pediatr. 2022;29(2):105-15.
Tawonsawatruk T, Prusmetikul S, Kanchanathepsak T, Patathong T, Klaewkasikum K, Woratanarat P, et al. Comparison of outcome between operative treatment and constraint-induced movement therapy for forearm and wrist deformities in cerebral palsy. A randomized controlled trial. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022;41(2):258-64.
Roberts H, Shierk A, Clegg NJ, Baldwin D, Smith L, Yeatts P, et al. Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Camp for Children with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy Augmented by Use of an Exoskeleton to Play Games in Virtual Reality. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2021;41(2):150-65.
Walker C, Shierk A, Roberts H. Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Infants and Toddlers with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review. Occup Ther Health Care. 2022;36(1):29-45.
Tang H, Pan J, Xu Y, Liu L, Yang X, Huang S, et al. Constraint therapy promotes motor cortex remodeling and functional improvement by regulating c-Jun/miR-182-5p/Nogo - A signals in hemiplegic cerebral palsy mice. Ann Anat. 2023;250:152136.
Rumajogee P, Altamentova S, Li J, Puvanenthirarajah N, Wang J, Asgarihafshejani A, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and Neural Precursor Cell (NPC) Transplantation Synergistically Promote Anatomical and Functional Recovery in a Hypoxic-Ischemic Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(17).
Ramey SL, DeLuca SC, Stevenson RD, Conaway M, Darragh AR, Lo W. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2021;148(5).
Dionisio MC, Terrill AL. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Infants With or at Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2022;76(2).
Liu LR, Wang YX, He L, Xu YX, Huang JY, Peng TT, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Promotes Neural Remodeling and Functional Reorganization by Overcoming Nogo-A/NgR/RhoA/ROCK Signals in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy Mice. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(2):145-57.
Damiano DL, Longo E. Early intervention evidence for infants with or at risk for cerebral palsy: an overview of systematic reviews. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63(7):771-84.
Pham VM, Hoang TL, Hoang KC, Nguyen NM, DeLuca SC, Coker-Bolt P. The effect of constraint-induced movement therapy for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy in Vietnam. Disabil Rehabil. 2025;47(4):912-8.
Baker A, Niles N, Kysh L, Sargent B. Effect of Motor Intervention for Infants and Toddlers With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022;34(3):297-307.
Regalado A, Decker B, Flaherty BM, Zimmer L, Brown I. Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Children With Hemiparesis Associated With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2023;77(3).
Wang TN, Liang KJ, Liu YC, Shieh JY, Chen HL. Effects of Intensive Versus Distributed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Quasi-Randomized Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023;37(2-3):109-18.
Liang KJ, Chen HL, Huang CW, Wang TN. Efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Bimanual Intensive Training on Motor and Psychosocial Outcomes in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2023;77(4).
Hwang Y, Kwon JY, Na Y. An Exploration of Tri-Axial Accelerometers in Assessing the Therapeutic Efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23(23).
Huang Y, Chen Z, Xu Y, Liu L, Tang H, He L, et al. Proteomic changes of the bilateral M1 and spinal cord in hemiplegic cerebral palsy mouse: Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy. Behav Brain Res. 2023;452:114583.
Jobst C, D'Souza SJ, Causton N, Master S, Switzer L, Cheyne D, et al. Somatosensory Plasticity in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy Following Constraint Induced Movement Therapy. Pediatr Neurol. 2022;126:80-8.
Hu C. Motor Restoration After EMG-Driven Robotic Hand Training and Personalized High Definition tDCS, From Neuroimagings to Clinical Outcomes: The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong); 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marish Memon , Kaneez Fatima, Peraha Wagan, Mahrukh, Marina Khan Soomro , Huma Memon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
