IMPACT OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING (BFRT) VERSUS TRADITIONAL STRENGTH TRAINING IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS ON PAIN AND QOL

Main Article Content

Muhammad Danial Baig Chughtai
Muhammad Baber Ikram
Abdul Hannan
Umama Uzair
Aqsa Arif
Aleena Jafar
Resha Manahil

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the third leading cause of disability worldwide, significantly impacting pain, physical function, and quality of life (QoL). Among its types, knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most prevalent, affecting over 80% of individuals with OA. Effective conservative management is crucial for mitigating its physical and social burden. Exercise therapy, including strength training, has been widely utilized; however, the comparative efficacy of blood flow restriction training (BFRT) and traditional strength training remains underexplored.


Objective: This study aimed to compare the impact of BFRT and traditional strength training on pain and QoL in patients with KOA.


Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2024 and August 2024, enrolling 38 patients with KOA using a purposive sampling technique. Participants aged 40–70 years with clinically and radiologically confirmed KOA experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms were included. Patients with contraindications to BFRT, such as vascular disorders or recent surgeries, were excluded. The interventions included BFRT with low-load resistance and traditional high-load strength training. Pain and QoL were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), respectively. Ethical considerations were followed throughout the study, and SPSS version 24 was used for statistical analysis.


Results: Baseline VAS scores were 7.4 ± 1.1 for the BFRT group and 7.3 ± 1.2 for the traditional group (p = 0.87). Post-intervention, VAS improved significantly in both groups, with BFRT showing a greater reduction (3.2 ± 1.0) compared to the traditional group (4.5 ± 1.1, p = 0.01). KOOS scores improved from 48.6 ± 6.9 to 72.3 ± 7.5 in the BFRT group and from 47.9 ± 7.2 to 64.7 ± 8.1 in the traditional group (p = 0.03). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements, with BFRT showing superior results.


Conclusion: Both BFRT and traditional strength training significantly improved pain and QoL in KOA patients, with BFRT yielding more pronounced benefits. BFRT offers a promising low-load alternative for managing pain and enhancing QoL in individuals with KOA.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Muhammad Danial Baig Chughtai, United College of Physical Therapy, Karachi, Pakistan.

Assistant Professor, United College of Physical Therapy, Karachi, Pakistan.

Muhammad Baber Ikram, Gujranwala Medical College Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan.

Gujranwala Medical College Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan.

Abdul Hannan, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute, Lahore, Pakistan.

Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute, Lahore, Pakistan.

Umama Uzair, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.

University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.

Aqsa Arif, Sialkot Institute of Science and Technology, Sialkot, Pakistan.

Sialkot Institute of Science and Technology, Sialkot, Pakistan.

Aleena Jafar, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Resha Manahil, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, Pakistan.