EFFECTIVENESS OF REGIONAL ANESTHESIA VS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN IMPROVING RECOVERY TIME FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY

Authors

  • Ahmad Nasir Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Muhammad Faisal Naeem Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Zohaib Zahid Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Zarnain Shafi Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Muhammad Abdullah Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71000/2cb4ny62

Keywords:

general anesthesia, pain management, patient satisfaction, Anesthesia, Regional, Knee Replacement Arthroplasty, Postoperative Complications, Recovery of Function

Abstract

Background: Total knee replacement (TKR) is a commonly performed orthopedic procedure aimed at relieving pain and restoring joint function in patients with advanced knee pathology. The choice of anesthesia—regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA)—has been shown to influence various recovery outcomes. RA is increasingly recognized for its potential to reduce postoperative pain, minimize systemic side effects, and accelerate rehabilitation. However, evidence comparing its effectiveness with GA remains inconsistent and context-specific.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia in improving early postoperative outcomes—specifically pain, mobility, complications, and patient satisfaction—within 24 hours of knee replacement surgery.

Methods: A descriptive analytical study was conducted over six months at Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, involving 79 patients aged 50–80 years undergoing primary unilateral knee replacement. Participants were grouped based on anesthesia type: RA (n=45) and GA (n=34). Data were collected through hospital records and structured patient feedback forms. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Additional outcomes included mobility status, presence of complications (e.g., nausea, respiratory issues, infection), discharge readiness, and satisfaction with pain management. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with a significance threshold of p<0.05.

Results: Patients receiving RA reported lower mean pain scores at 6 hours (4.72 ± 2.02), 12 hours (3.04 ± 1.57), and 24 hours (3.39 ± 1.87), compared to GA patients (6.74 ± 2.42, 4.26 ± 1.89, and 4.75 ± 2.76, respectively; p<0.05 for all). Mobility within 24 hours was achieved by 50.6% of participants, and 54.4% were discharge-ready. Additionally, 54.4% reported no nausea, while 53.2% experienced respiratory complications. Overall satisfaction with pain management was noted in 39.2% of cases.

Conclusion: Regional anesthesia was more effective than general anesthesia in enhancing early postoperative recovery in knee replacement patients, offering better pain control, fewer side effects, and faster ambulation. These findings support the broader use of RA in TKR procedures, though further research is needed to explore long-term benefits.

Author Biographies

  • Ahmad Nasir, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

     Student of BS Anaesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Muhammad Faisal Naeem, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

     Lecturer, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Zohaib Zahid, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

    Student of BS Anaesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Zarnain Shafi, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

    Student of BS Anaesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Muhammad Abdullah, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

     Student of BS Anaesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

References

Wilczyński M, Bieniek M, Krakowski P, Karpinski R. Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary knee replacement: A narrative review. Materials. 2024;17(5):1136.

Albishi W, AbuDujain NM, Aldhahri M, Alzeer M. Unicompartmental knee replacement: controversies and technical considerations. Arthroplasty. 2024;6(1):21.

Johns N, Naylor JM, McKenzie D, Brady B, Thirugnanam B, Olver J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes or strategies to treat people with persistent knee pain following a total knee replacement. Musculoskelet Care. 2024;22(3): e1945.

Zhang S, Liau ZQG, Tan KLM, Chua WL. Evaluating the accuracy and relevance of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions regarding total knee replacement. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2024;36(1):15.

Pavel MA, Petersen EN, Wang H, Lerner RA, Hansen SB. Studies on the mechanism of general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(24):13757-66.

Alturki AA, Aljaafri ZA, Alshabraqi H, Hassan I, Alturki A, Alhandi AA, et al. regional anesthesia for high-risk patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A case report. Cureus. 2024;16(2).

Dixit AA, Sekeres G, Mariano ER, Memtsoudis SG, Sun EC. Association of patient race and hospital with utilization of regional anesthesia for treatment of post-operative pain in total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis using Medicare claims. Anesthesiology. 2024;140(2):220.

Costa F, Ruggiero A, Fusco P, Ricci M, Del Buono R, Strumia A, et al. Fascial plane blocks for postoperative pain management after fast-track total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review. Saudi J Anaesth. 2025;19(2):209-20.

Forero JP, Sun EC, Mariano ER, Dixit AA. Anesthesia care for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: A narrative review of disparities in regional anesthesia and recommendations for future research directions. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2024;15(1):1.

Oh TK, Song I-A. Regional versus general anesthesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024.

Alverina F, Suryani RL, Burhan A. An overview caring behavior of anesthesiologist in spinal anesthesia patients at RSUD Cilacap. Java Nurs J. 2024;2(2):124-30.

Kalluri M, Edalatpour A, Kohan J, Bevil K, Gander B. Utility of spinal anesthesia in plastic surgery and other surgical subspecialties: A literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024; 95:266-72.

Jin SY, Munro A, Aidemouni M, McKeen DM, Uppal V. The incidence and predictors of failed spinal anesthesia after intrathecal injection of local anesthetic for cesarean delivery: a single-center, 9-year retrospective review. Anesth Analg. 2024;138(2):430-7.

Moisa RC, Negrut N, Macovei IC, Moisa CCM, John HT, Marian P. The impact of fentanyl and morphine on maternal hemodynamics in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18(3):392.

Heckmann ND, De A, Porter KR, Stambough JB. Spinal versus general anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty: are there differences in complication and readmission rates? J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(4):673-9.e1.

McGain F, Sheridan N, Wickramarachchi K, Yates S, Chan B, McAlister S. Carbon footprint of general, regional, and combined anesthesia for total knee replacements. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(6):976-91.

Owen AR, Amundson AW, Larson DR, Duncan CM, Smith HM, Johnson RL, et al. Spinal versus general anaesthesia in contemporary primary total knee arthroplasties. Bone Joint J. 2022;104(11):1209-14.

Alvarez J. Spinal anesthesia medication regimens for total knee replacement: A quality improvement project: Case Western Reserve University; 2023.

Lee S, Kim MK, Ahn E, Jung Y. Comparison of general and regional anesthesia on short-term complications in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study using national health insurance service-national sample cohort. Medicine. 2023;102(8): e33032.

Matharu GS, Garriga C, Rangan A, Judge A. Does regional anesthesia reduce complications following total hip and knee replacement compared with general anesthesia? An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):1521-8. e5.

Sim JA, Lee MG, Jung WS, Lee BK, Lee BH. Clinical efficacy of adductor canal block in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee. 2021;29:9-14.

Bai S, Hu A, Li W, Chen Y, Li X, Song X, et al. Comparing the analgesic effects of femoral triangle block and adductor canal block following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025;25(1):202.

Jaremko I, Lukaševič K, Tarasevičius Š, Zeniauskas L, Macas A, Gelmanas A. Comparison of 2 Peripheral Nerve Blocks Techniques for Functional Recovery and Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e932848.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21