VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF PAKISTANI URDU VERSION SHORT FORM McGill PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE IN POST CARDIAC SURGERY PATIENTS

Authors

  • Dr Mubashra Malik Senior Lecturer Iqra University Chak Shahzad Campus Islamabad Author
  • Dr.Muhammad Tahir Hafeez Senior Lecturer Iqra University Chak Shahzad Campus Islamabad Author
  • Fahad Tanveer HOD Rehabilitation Sciences, Green International University Lahore Author
  • Habib Ur Rehman Physiotherapist, Masood Hospital Lahore Author
  • Fareeha Chaudhary Clinical Physiotherapist, Capital Diagnostic Center Islamabad Author
  • Arslan Saeed Johar Institute of Professional Studies Lahore Author
  • Sardar Abdul Hanan Saeed Shifa International hospital Islambad Author
  • Dr Rafia Imtiaz Government College University Faisalabad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71000/f4xxpr38

Keywords:

Cardiac surgery; McGill Pain Questionnaire; Numeric Pain Rating Scale; Pain; Reliability; Short Form Health Survey; Urdu; Validity.

Abstract

Background: The Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a multidimensional pain measure that captures pain intensity together with sensory and affective qualities. Linguistically appropriate validation is important when a patient-reported outcome measure is used in a population whose primary clinical language differs from the source version, particularly after cardiac surgery when pain changes rapidly during recovery.

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Pakistani Urdu version of the SF-MPQ in patients after cardiac surgery through median sternotomy.

Methods: This observational psychometric validation study included 265 clinically stable post-cardiac-surgery patients recruited by purposive sampling from the Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology between June 2021 and June 2022. Ten experts reviewed the Urdu version for face and content validity. Concurrent validity was examined by correlating Urdu and English SF-MPQ scores on postoperative day (POD) 1. Construct validity was examined against the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) on POD 4, 6, and 15 and against the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) on POD 6 and 15. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to examine factor structure.

Results: The mean age was 58 +/- 9.4 years and 206/265 participants (77.7%) were male. Expert agreement for face validity was 100%, and item- and scale-level content validity indices were 1.0. Concurrent validity between the Urdu and English versions was very strong (r = 0.980, p < 0.001). Correlations with NPRS were strong across POD 4, 6, and 15 (r = 0.796-0.850, 0.809-0.846, and 0.811, respectively; all p < 0.001). Correlation with the SF-12 was weakly negative on POD 6 (r = -0.315, p < 0.001) and negligible on POD 15 (r = 0.021, p = 0.734). Overall Cronbach alpha was 0.913 on POD 4 and 0.861 on POD 6; corresponding ICCs were 0.841 and 0.755. Domain ICCs were heterogeneous: sensory 0.098, affective 0.907, intensity 0.957, and present pain intensity 0.915. EFA retained five components explaining approximately 65% of the variance; the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.538.

Conclusion: The Pakistani Urdu SF-MPQ demonstrated strong concurrent validity with the English version, strong convergence with NPRS, and good overall reliability in this post-cardiac-surgery sample. However, the weak association with SF-12, poor sensory-domain test-retest reliability, and marginal factorability indicate that the psychometric performance was not uniformly strong across all domains. The instrument may support Urdu-language pain assessment in similar clinically stable patients, with cautious interpretation of subscale scores and further multicentre validation.

Keywords: Cardiac surgery; McGill Pain Questionnaire; Numeric Pain Rating Scale; Pain; Reliability; Short Form Health Survey; Urdu; Validity.

References

Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: from description to measurement. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(1):199-202. doi:10.1097/00000542-200507000-00028.

Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975;1(3):277-299. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.

Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30(2):191-197. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8.

Krakowski JC, Hallman MJ, Smeltz AM. Persistent pain after cardiac surgery: prevention and management. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;25(4):289-300. doi:10.1177/10892532211041320.

Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(8):2197-2218. doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4.

Terkawi AS, Tsang S, Abolkhair A, Alsharif M, Alswiti M, Alsadoun A, et al. Development and validation of Arabic version of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(Suppl 1):S2-S10. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_42_17.

Park KS, Castaneda AM, Choi JK, Park SY, Jung SA, Kim BR, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean versions of the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (MGPQ-SF) and Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) in neuropathic pain patients. Int J Pain. 2017;8(1):1-15.

Hasvik E, Haugen AJ, Haukeland-Parker S, Rimehaug SA, Gjerstad J, Grovle L. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Norwegian Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 in low back-related leg pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(13):E774-E781. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002976.

Mehdizadeh M, Fereshtehnejad SM, Goudarzi S, Moshtagh A, Dehghanian Nasrabadi F, Habibi SAH, et al. Validity and reliability of Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in Iranian people with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2020;2020:2793945. doi:10.1155/2020/2793945.

Edirisinghe NP, Makuloluwa TR, Amarasekara TD, Goonewardena CSE. Psychometric properties of Sinhala version of Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF MPQ-2-Sin) among patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka. Pain Res Manag. 2019;2019:5050979. doi:10.1155/2019/5050979.

Jorns TP, Loppanthong S, Pansaeng P, Puasiri S. Validity and reliability testing of the E-san version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in musculoskeletal, neuropathic and odontogenic pain. J Med Assoc Thai. 2019;102(4):75-81.

Yakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, Uygur F. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(7):1083-1087. doi:10.1007/s10067-006-0452-1.

Sharif A, Amjad F, Arslan SA, Ahmad A. Translation and validation of Urdu version Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire-2. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023;15(1):102. doi:10.1186/s13102-023-00715-2.

Wang JL, Zhang WJ, Gao M, Zhang S, Tian DH, Chen J. A cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2: Chinese version in patients with chronic visceral pain. J Pain Res. 2017;10:121-128. doi:10.2147/JPR.S116997.

Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195-201. doi:10.4103/1117-1936.173959.

Arafat SMY. Validation study can be a separate study design. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;5(11):2421-2422. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2016.19042016471.

Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Revicki DA, Harding G, Coyne KS, Peirce-Sandner S, et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain. 2009;144(1-2):35-42. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.007.

Rodriguez CS. Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2001;2(2):38-46. doi:10.1053/jpmn.2001.23746.

Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1990;17(8):1022-1024.

Arovah NI, Heesch KC. Assessment of the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of Short Form 12 (SF-12). J Prev Med Hyg. 2021;62(2):E421-E429. doi:10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1878.

Luo X, George ML, Kakouras I, Edwards CL, Pietrobon R, Richardson W, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Short Form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(15):1739-1745. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000083169.58671.96.

Alharbi HA, Albabtain MA, Alobiad N, Aba Alhasan J, Alruhaimi M, Alnefisah M, et al. Pain perception assessment using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire after cardiac surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020;14(3):343-348. doi:10.4103/sja.SJA_34_20.

Adelmanesh F, Arvantaj A, Rashki H, Ketabchi SM, Montazeri A, Raissi G. Results from the translation and adaptation of the Iranian Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (I-SF-MPQ): preliminary evidence of its reliability, construct validity and sensitivity in an Iranian pain population. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011;3(1):27. doi:10.1186/1758-2555-3-27.

Tsui FPY, Wong SSC, Chan TCW, Lee Y, Cheung CW. A validation study of the Cantonese Chinese version of Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 in Cantonese-speaking patients with chronic pain in Hong Kong. Pain Pract. 2024;24(3):449-457. doi:10.1111/papr.13319.

Katijjahbe MA, Royse C, Granger C, Denehy L, Ali NAM, Abdul Rahman MR, et al. Location and patterns of persistent pain following cardiac surgery. Heart Lung Circ. 2021;30(8):1232-1243. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2020.12.009.

Viana LBR, Oliveira EJSG, Oliveira CMB, Moura ECR, Viana LHL, Nina VJS, et al. Assessment of pain and quality of life in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a cohort study. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023;69(3):473-478. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.20221655.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-29

How to Cite

1.
Dr Mubashra Malik, Dr.Muhammad Tahir Hafeez, Fahad Tanveer, Habib Ur Rehman, Fareeha Chaudhary, Arslan Saeed, et al. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF PAKISTANI URDU VERSION SHORT FORM McGill PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE IN POST CARDIAC SURGERY PATIENTS. IJHR [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 29 [cited 2026 Oct. 20];4(3):1-8. Available from: https://insightsjhr.com/index.php/home/article/view/1740