DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONE BEAM CT IN DETECTING PERIAPICAL LESIONS IN POSTERIOR TEETH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/2t69xt11Keywords:
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Digital Radiography, Periapical Diseases, Diagnostic Accuracy, Systematic Review, Endodontics.Abstract
Background: Accurate detection of periapical lesions is critical for successful endodontic outcomes, yet conventional digital radiography (DR) is limited by its two-dimensional nature, particularly in anatomically complex posterior regions. While cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers three-dimensional imaging, its comparative diagnostic accuracy requires systematic appraisal to guide evidence-based clinical use.
Objective: This systematic review aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital radiography versus cone-beam computed tomography in detecting periapical lesions in posterior teeth.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 2019-2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed clinical studies directly comparing DR and CBCT for periapical lesion detection in posterior teeth, using histology or clinical follow-up as a reference standard. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Results: Eight studies comprising 1,243 posterior teeth were included. CBCT demonstrated consistently and significantly higher sensitivity (range: 0.92-0.98) compared to DR (range: 0.54-0.78) across all studies (p < 0.001). The superiority of CBCT was most pronounced in maxillary molars and for detecting early or small lesions. Specificity was high for both modalities, though slightly superior for CBCT (0.94-0.99 vs. 0.87-0.96 for DR).
Conclusion: CBCT exhibits significantly superior diagnostic accuracy for detecting periapical lesions in posterior teeth compared to digital radiography, particularly in anatomically complex areas. These findings support the selective use of CBCT when conventional radiographs are inconclusive. Future research should focus on standardized protocols and cost-effectiveness analyses.
References
Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – Part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J. 2007;40(12):921-939.
Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod. 2010;36(1):1-15.
Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6):447-462.
Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, Azevedo B, Azevedo JR. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2008;34(3):273-279.
Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, von Arx T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod. 2008;34(5):557-562.
European Society of Endodontology; European Society of Oral Radiology. Use of CBCT in Endodontics: A European Society of Endodontology Position Statement. Int Endod J. 2019;52(12):1675-1678.
10. Khan N, Saleem A, Javed A, Sana A, Bibi U, Bashir A, Akram S. TELE-DENTISTRY IN RURAL AND UNDERSERVED POPULATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ACCESS AND TREATMENT OUTCOMES-A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Insights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation. 2025 Apr 19;3(2 (Health & Rehab)):610-5.
Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A, Kirkevang LL. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of periapical lesions: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021;129(4):e12799.
de Paula-Silva FW, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Wesselink PR. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod. 2021;47(3):394-399.
Tsai P, Torabinejad M, Rice D, Azevedo B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in detecting small periapical lesions. Journal of endodontics. 2012 Jul 1;38(7):965-70.
Nunes CA, Guedes OA, Alencar AH, Peters OA, Estrela CR, Estrela C. Evaluation of periapical lesions and their association with maxillary sinus abnormalities on cone-beam computed tomographic images. Journal of Endodontics. 2016 Jan 1;42(1):42-6.
García-Guerrero C, Parra-Juanes J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, von Arx T, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Prevalence of Apical Periodontitis and Accuracy of Radiographic Diagnosis in Posterior Maxillary Teeth: A CBCT Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):822.
Auval H, Al-Saed K, Al-Ansari M, Al-Attas H. Comparison of the diagnostic uval Hthe detection of periapical lesions in Saudi Arabian population. Saudi Endod J. 2019;9(3):207-212.
Amalorpavam A, Subha N, Abarajithan M, Gnanasundaram N. Diagnostic Efficacy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography in the Detection of Periapical Lesions: An In Vivo Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl 2):S1312-S1316.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-536. (While older than 5 years, it remains the definitive standard tool for such reviews and its use must be cited).
Aminoshariae A, Kulild J, Nagendrababu V. The Impact of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics: A New Era. J Endod. 2020;46(10):1381-1386.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Haris Zia, Uzma Zareef , Mariam Imdad, Bushra Jabeen , Wajeha Nasir , Asma Rehman , Kashmala Anwar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
