EVALUATE SCOLIOSIS SEVERITY AND ITS IMPACT ON SPINAL CURVATURE, VERTEBRAL HEIGHT REDUCTION USING ADVANCE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING TECHNIQUES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/6ms3bk10Keywords:
Scoliosis, Computed Tomography, Cobb Angle, , Spinal Curvature, , ,Vertebral compression, , Scoliosis Severity, Spinal DegenerationAbstract
Background: Scoliosis is a complex spinal disorder characterized by abnormal lateral curvature, often resulting in vertebral deformity and compromised posture. Conventional radiographs provide limited assessment, particularly in evaluating vertebral height and axial rotation. Computed Tomography (CT) offers high-resolution, three-dimensional imaging, enabling detailed evaluation of spinal alignment, curvature, and structural integrity. This study explores the role of CT imaging in determining scoliosis severity and its degenerative implications on vertebral architecture.
Objective: To assess the severity of scoliosis and its effects on spinal curvature and vertebral height reduction using advanced computed tomography techniques.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted over four months in the Radiology Department of Ghurki Trust and Teaching Hospital. Fifty patients aged 7 to 70 years, fulfilling strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, underwent CT scans using a 16-slice Toshiba Aquilion machine. Demographic data, Cobb angles, vertebral height measurements, and degenerative spinal findings were recorded. CT images were interpreted by expert radiologists, and data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Statistical correlations were drawn between scoliosis severity and structural spinal changes.
Results: Among the 50 patients, 29 (58%) were female and 21 (42%) male. Left-sided convexity was more common (66%) compared to right (34%). Cobb angle distribution included 17 (34%) patients at 10°, 13 (26%) at 15°, 10 (20%) at 20°, and 5 (10%) each at 30° and 40°. Vertebral height reduction was observed in all patients: 2 mm in 12 (24%), 3 mm in 23 (46%), 4 mm in 13 (26%), and 5 mm in 2 (4%) cases. Degenerative spinal changes were present in 8 (16%) patients; osteopenia in 6 (12%) and osteoporosis in 1 (2%). Disc degeneration was universal, graded as mild in 35 (70%), moderate in 13 (26%), and severe in 2 (4%).
Conclusion: CT imaging proved highly effective in detecting scoliosis severity, vertebral height loss, and associated degenerative changes. The correlation between increased Cobb angles and vertebral deformation supports CT as a valuable tool for early diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment planning in scoliosis management.
References
Bearce EA, Ricamona BTB, Fisher KH, O'Hara-Smith JR, Grimes DT. Visualization and quantitation of spine deformity in zebrafish models of scoliosis by micro-computed tomography. STAR Protoc. 2023;4(4):102739.
Oba H, Uehara M, Ikegami S, Hatakenaka T, Kamanaka T, Miyaoka Y, et al. Tips and pitfalls to improve accuracy and reduce radiation exposure in intraoperative CT navigation for pediatric scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine J. 2023;23(2):183-96.
Gaume M, Langlais T, Loiselet K, Pannier S, Skalli W, Vergari C, et al. Spontaneous induced bone fusion in minimally invasive fusionless bipolar fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis: a computed tomography analysis. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(7):2550-7.
Li X, An B, Jiang B, Xu S, Liu H, Zhao H. Pharynx volume derived from three-dimensional computed tomography is associated with difficult intubation in spinal deformity surgery: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(41):e31139.
Pablo AJ, Tello C, Lucas P, Eduardo G, Rodrigo R, Julián C, et al. Pelvic asymmetry in children with neuromuscular scoliosis: a computed tomography-based 3D analysis. Spine Deform. 2025;13(3):851-9.
Yang H, Liu Z, Guan L, Liu Y, Liu T, Hai Y. Is the Risk of Aorta Injury or Impingement Higher During Correction Surgery in Patients with Severe and Rigid Scoliosis? World Neurosurg. 2020;139:e626-e34.
Strandberg L, Jonasson P, Larsson M. EVALUATION OF RADIATION DOSES USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR AND SCOLIOSIS PROCEDURES. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2021;195(3-4):306-13.
Loughenbury PR, Gentles SL, Murphy EJ, Tomlinson JE, Borse VH, Dunsmuir RA, et al. Estimated cumulative X-ray exposure and additional cancer risk during the evaluation and treatment of scoliosis in children and young people requiring surgery. Spine Deform. 2021;9(4):949-54.
de Reuver S, de Block N, Brink RC, Chu WCW, Cheng JCY, Kruyt MC, et al. Convex-concave and anterior-posterior spinal length discrepancies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with major right thoracic curves versus matched controls. Spine Deform. 2023;11(1):87-93.
Wang J, Zhou B, Yang X, Zhou C, Ling T, Hu B, et al. Computed tomography-based bronchial tree three-dimensional reconstruction and airway resistance evaluation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(8):1981-92.
Zhang M, Chen W, Wang S, Lei S, Liu Y, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Validation of the Differences Between Two-Dimensional Radiography and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Measurements of the Spine in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 2022;165:e689-e96.
Kudo H, Wada K, Kumagai G, Tanaka S, Asari T, Ishibashi Y. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement by fluoroscopy, a three-dimensional printed model, local electrical conductivity measurement device, and intraoperative computed tomography navigation in scoliosis patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31(3):563-9.
Yang KG, Goff E, Cheng KL, Kuhn GA, Wang Y, Cheng JC, et al. Abnormal morphological features of osteocyte lacunae in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A large-scale assessment by ultra-high-resolution micro-computed tomography. Bone. 2023;166:116594.
Machado VS, Cristante AF, Todari LWA, Barros Filho TEP de, Marcon RM. COVID-19: SPINE SURGERY AND DOCTOR TRAINING AT A HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL. Coluna/Columna. 2024;23(1)
Xiao B, Zhang Y, Yan K, Jiang J, Ma C, Xing Y, Liu B, Tian W. Where should scoliometer and EOS imaging be applied when evaluating spinal rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A preliminary study with reference to CT images. Global Spine J. 2022;14(2):577–582.
Schlösser TPC, Semple T, Carr SB, Padley S, Loebinger MR, Hogg C, Castelein RM. Scoliosis convexity and organ anatomy are related. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(10):2936–42.
Lenz M, Oikonomidis S, Harland A, Fürnstahl P, Farshad M, Bredow J, et al. Scoliosis and Prognosis—a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression. European Spine Journal. 2021 Mar 26;30(7):1813–22.
Rahmani N, Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Bassampour SA, Kiani A. Prevalence of scoliosis and associated risk factors in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Spine Deform. 2021;9(5):1137–49.
Shimizu M, Kobayashi T, Chiba H, Senoo I, Ito H, Matsukura K, et al. Adult spinal deformity and its relationship with height loss: a 34-year longitudinal cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020 Jul 1;21(1).
Alrehily F, Hogg P, Twiste M, Johansen S, Tootell A. The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images. Radiography. 2020 May;26(2): e73–7.
Li J, Gao J, Zhao Z, Canavese F, Cai Q, Li Y, Wang Y. Quantitative computed tomography assessment of bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: correlations with Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, and Risser sign. Translational Pediatrics. 2024 Apr 29;13(4):610.
Yeung KH, Man GC, Deng M, Lam TP, Cheng JC, Chan KC, Chu WC. Morphological changes of Intervertebral Disc detectable by T2-weighted MRI and its correlation with curve severity in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022 Jul 10;23(1):655.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fariha Imran, Urooj Javed, Iram Sharif, Jawad Anwar, Maria Javed, Iqra Saeed (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
