COMPARISON BETWEEN TIVA AND INHALATIONAL ANESTHETICS, RISKS AND BENEFITS

Authors

  • M. Farhan Tahir Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Waleed Ahmad Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Naheed Ahmad Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Nuzhat Waseem Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Ayesha Naz Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Huria Shahzad Superior University Lahore, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71000/77q6m886

Keywords:

Propofol, Inhalational anesthesia, patient satisfaction, Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthesia, Intravenous, Postoperative Complications, Recovery of Function

Abstract

Background: General anesthesia is administered to over 300 million individuals annually worldwide, with inhalational anesthesia (IA) and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) being the two principal maintenance techniques. IA commonly involves the use of volatile agents like sevoflurane, desflurane, or isoflurane, whereas TIVA relies on continuous infusion of intravenous agents such as propofol. As surgical techniques evolve, it is increasingly important to assess the clinical outcomes, recovery profiles, and patient-centered metrics associated with these anesthesia modalities to inform individualized anesthetic planning.

Objective: To compare postoperative complications, recovery characteristics, and patient satisfaction between TIVA and inhalational anesthesia, and to explore future implications for anesthetic practice.

Methods: This cross-sectional, randomized study included 98 adult patients undergoing elective and emergency surgeries at three tertiary care hospitals. Patients were equally divided into TIVA (n=49) and IA (n=49) groups. Parameters assessed included intraoperative and postoperative complications, time to eye opening, postoperative pain scores, and overall patient satisfaction. Data were collected through structured observation and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Chi-square and independent t-tests were applied, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: TIVA resulted in a smoother recovery experience (77.8%) compared to IA (62%), with a statistically significant difference (p=0.006). Mean time to eye opening was shorter in the TIVA group (8.84 minutes) than in the IA group (9.73 minutes, p<0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting occurred in 22.2% of TIVA patients and 20% of IA patients (p=0.830). Mean postoperative pain scores were higher in the TIVA group (4.06) than in the IA group (3.71), showing statistical significance (p=0.0481). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the TIVA group (77.8% vs. 62%, p=0.044).

Conclusion: TIVA demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of recovery time and patient satisfaction, although it was associated with slightly higher postoperative pain scores. The choice of anesthetic technique should be tailored to patient-specific factors, surgical needs, and anesthetic expertise.

Author Biographies

  • M. Farhan Tahir, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

    Student of BS Anesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Waleed Ahmad, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Lecturer, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Naheed Ahmad, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

    Student of BS Anesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Nuzhat Waseem, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

    Student of BS Anesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Ayesha Naz, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

    Student of BS Anesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Huria Shahzad, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

    Student of BS Anesthesia Technology, Department of Emerging Allied Health Technology, FAHS, Superior University Lahore, Pakistan.

References

Duan GY, Duan ZX, Chen H, Chen F, Chen F, Du ZY, et al. Cognitive function and delirium following sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia for valve replacement surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2023;39(2):166-74.

Milne B, John M, Evans R, Robertson S, P ÓS, Murphy GJ, et al. Comparison between propofol and total inhalational anaesthesia on cardiovascular outcomes following on-pump cardiac surgery in higher-risk patients: a randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study. Open Heart. 2024;11(1).

Varsha AV, Unnikrishnan KP, Saravana Babu MS, Raman SP, Koshy T. Comparison of Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia versus Volatile Anesthesia with Sevoflurane for Postoperative Delirium in Adult Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blinded Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024;38(9):1932-40.

Cho SA, Ahn SM, Kwon W, Sung TY. Comparison of remimazolam and desflurane in emergence agitation after general anesthesia for nasal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024;77(4):432-40.

Kutanis D, Erturk E, Akdogan A, Besir A, Altinbas A, Orem A, et al. Comparison of the effects of axillary brachial plexus block, inhalation anesthesia, and total intravenous anesthesia on tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury in upper extremity surgery. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024;30(7):510-7.

Zhang YT, Chen Y, Shang KX, Yu H, Li XF, Yu H. Effect of Volatile Anesthesia Versus Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2024;139(3):571-80.

Deng XQ, Yu H, Wang WJ, Wu QL, Wei H, Deng JS, et al. Effect of volatile versus propofol anaesthesia on major complications and mortality after cardiac surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133(2):296-304.

Ackerman RS, Luddy KA, Icard BE, Piñeiro Fernández J, Gatenby RA, Muncey AR. The Effects of Anesthetics and Perioperative Medications on Immune Function: A Narrative Review. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(3):676-89.

Pang QY, Duan LP, Jiang Y, Liu HL. Effects of inhalation and propofol anaesthesia on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly noncardiac surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(43):e27668.

Oh AR, Park J, Lee JH, Ahn J, Lee D, Yoo SY. Effects of inhalation versus total intravenous anaesthesia on long-term mortality in older patients after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133(4):776-84.

Aijima R, Miura D, Takamori A, Kamohara A, Danjo A, Sakaguchi Y, et al. Impact of general anesthesia on postoperative complications in orthognathic surgery: a retrospective comparison of total intravenous anesthesia versus volatile anesthesia. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16075.

Xiong X, He Y, Zhou C, Zheng Q, Chen C, Liang P. Impact of total intravenous anesthesia and total inhalation anesthesia as the anesthesia maintenance approaches on blood glucose level and postoperative complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23(1):267.

Hasselager RP, Hallas J, Gögenur I. Inhalation anaesthesia compared with total intravenous anaesthesia and postoperative complications in colorectal cancer surgery: an observational registry-based study(†). Br J Anaesth. 2022;129(3):416-26.

Riedel B, Dubowitz J, Yeung J, Jhanji S, Kheterpal S, Avidan MS. On the horns of a dilemma: choosing total intravenous anaesthesia or volatile anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129(3):284-9.

Ogata F, Nakamura T, Hoshijima H, Doi K, Nagasaka H, Mieda T. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Minor Oral Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anesth Prog. 2024;71(4):163-70.

Wong SSC, Choi EKY, Chan WS, Cheung CW. Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22(1):140.

Sagalow ES, Estephan LE, Kumar AT, Hwang M, Krein H, Heffelfinger R. Recovery Benefit With Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Receiving Rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;169(3):489-95.

Chang YT, Shen CH. Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications-Reply. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(4):376-7.

Ahmed MM, Tian C, Lu J, Lee Y. Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia and Nausea and Vomiting After Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Asian J Anesthesiol. 2021;59(4):135-51.

Monfort C, Oulehri W, Morisson L, Courgeon V, Harkouk H, Othenin-Girard A, et al. Using the nociception level index to compare the intraoperative antinociceptive effect of propofol and sevoflurane during clinical and experimental noxious stimulus in patients under general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2024;96:111484.

Zhang Y, Wang F, Zhang H, Wei Y, Deng Y, Wang D. Volatile anesthesia versus propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia: A retrospective analysis of charts of patients who underwent elective digestive tract cancer curative surgeries. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(29):e29169.

Zhou D, Zhu X, Wang L, Yang X, Liu Y, Zhang X. Which Anesthesia Regimen Is Best to Reduce Pulmonary Complications After Head and Neck Surgery? Laryngoscope. 2021;131(1):E108-e15.

Tsuang, A., Chan, E. S., & Wang, J. (2021). Food-induced anaphylaxis in infants: can new evidence assist with implementation of food allergy prevention and treatment? The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 9(1), 57-69.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21