MUSCLE ENERGY TECHNIQUE WITH AND WITHOUT MYOFASCIAL RELEASE IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/vy8k2r11Keywords:
Cervicogenic Headache, Manual Therapy, Muscle Energy Technique, Myofascial Release, Neck Pain, Range of Motion, RehabilitationAbstract
Background: Cervicogenic headache (CGH) is a secondary headache disorder originating from cervical spine and muscular dysfunction, frequently involving the trapezius muscle. Manual therapy remains a cornerstone of conservative management, with Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Myofascial Release (MFR) widely used to address pain, mobility restriction, and functional impairment. While both techniques are individually effective, evidence comparing MET alone with its combination with MFR remains limited, particularly in relation to pain intensity, cervical range of motion (ROM), and disability outcomes in CGH.
Objective: To compare the effects of Muscle Energy Technique with and without Myofascial Release on pain intensity, cervical range of motion, and functional disability in patients with cervicogenic headache.
Methods: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 40 adults aged 20–40 years diagnosed with cervicogenic headache. Participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group A received MET alone (n = 20), and Group B received MET combined with MFR (n = 20). Both groups underwent five treatment sessions over two weeks. Outcome measures included pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), cervical range of motion measured with a goniometer, and disability evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Assessments were performed at baseline and post-intervention. Statistical analysis was carried out using paired and independent t-tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pain, cervical ROM, and disability following intervention (p < 0.05). Pain intensity in Group A decreased from 6.0 ± 0.5 to 2.8 ± 0.4, while Group B showed a greater reduction from 7.0 ± 0.4 to 1.0 ± 0.2. Disability scores improved from 26.5 ± 3.2 to 13.5 ± 1.9 in Group A and from 29.5 ± 2.0 to 8.0 ± 1.2 in Group B. Cervical flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation improved significantly in both groups, with consistently larger gains observed in the MET plus MFR group (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Both MET alone and MET combined with MFR were effective in reducing pain and improving cervical mobility and function in patients with cervicogenic headache. However, the addition of MFR to MET produced superior outcomes across all measured parameters, supporting the clinical value of addressing both muscular and myofascial dysfunction for comprehensive CGH management.
References
Alghanim, H. A., Almahdi, M. A. M., Alahmadi, A. O., Salah, A. N. A., Arfaj, Y. K., Aldakhil, L. S., Alsoairy, K. A., Alresaini, H. H., Alali, M. A., & Aldanyowi, S. N. (2024). A systematic review on the efficacy of multidisciplinary approaches in the management of chronic pain. International Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries, 8(9), 0–0.
Alvarez, G., Núñez-Cortés, R., Solà, I., Sitjà-Rabert, M., Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A., Fernández, C., Bonfill, X., & Urrútia, G. (2021). Sample size, study length, and inadequate controls were the most common self-acknowledged limitations in manual therapy trials: A methodological review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 96–106
Bini, P., Hohenschurz-Schmidt, D., Masullo, V., Pitt, D., & Draper-Rodi, J. (2022). The effectiveness of manual and exercise therapy on headache intensity and frequency among patients with cervicogenic headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 30(1), 49.
Brandl, A., Egner, C., Reer, R., Schmidt, T., & Schleip, R. (2023). Immediate effects of myofascial release treatment on lumbar microcirculation: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(4).
El Sabbahi, S. A., Fahmy, E. M., Heneidy, S., Mahmoud, M. A. H., & Hossam, A. (2025). Effectiveness of combined cranial and cervical mobilization in management of cervicogenic headache. The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 61(1), 18.
Emam, M. A., Hortobágyi, T., Horváth, A. A., Ragab, S., & Ramadan, M. (2024). Proprioceptive training improves postural stability and reduces pain in cervicogenic headache patients: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(22).
Ghulam, H. S., Alqhtani, R. S., Alshahrani, A., Ahmed, H., Khan, A. R., & Khan, A. (2023). Efficacy of cervical mobilization with post-isometric relaxation in managing mechanical neck pain, ROM, and functional limitations associated with myofascial trigger points. Medicine, 102(52), e36710.
Gupta, R., Mehra, S., & Taneja, N. (2024). Comparative analysis of myofascial release and muscle energy technique on cervicogenic headache patients: A clinical study. Indian Journal of Physical Therapy Research, 6(1), 59–66.
Huang, L. L., Huang, T. S., Lin, Y. H., Huang, C. Y., Yang, J. L., & Lin, J. J. (2022). Effects of upper trapezius myofascial trigger points on scapular kinematics and muscle activation in overhead athletes. Journal of Human Kinetics, 84, 32–42.
Hussain, G., Arsh, A., Rehman, F., & Khan, S. (2025). Immediate effects of muscle energy technique on pain and range of motion in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 41(5), 1365–1369.
Jung, A., Carvalho, G. F., Szikszay, T. M., Pawlowsky, V., Gabler, T., & Luedtke, K. (2023). Physical therapist interventions to reduce headache intensity, frequency, and duration in patients with cervicogenic headache: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Physical Therapy, 104(2).
Kaur, G., Bindra, S., & Singh, P. (2023). Combined effect of dry needling and muscle energy technique on neck pain of myofascial origin. Physiotherapy - The Journal of Indian Association of Physiotherapists, 17(2), 78–88.
Kaur, P., & Choudhary, N. (2023). Comparative effects of dry needling and muscle energy technique on myofascial neck pain. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation, 15(1), 21–29.
Li, Y., Li, X., Song, H., Shou, Y., & Fang, Q. (2024). Health-related outcomes with supervised exercise and myofascial release versus only supervised exercise in subacromial pain syndrome: A randomized controlled single-blind study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 16(1), 171.
Lin, L. H., Lin, T. Y., Chang, K. V., Wu, W. T., & Özçakar, L. (2023). Muscle energy technique to reduce pain and disability in cases of non-specific neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heliyon, 9(11), e22469.
Lu, Z., Zou, H., Zhao, P., Wang, J., & Wang, R. (2024). Myofascial release for the treatment of tension-type, cervicogenic headache or migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Research & Management, 2024, 2042069.
Mittal, S., & Sharma, N. (2024). Effects of myofascial release and muscle energy technique on chronic neck pain: A scoping review. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 10(2), 85–93.
Mohamed, O. A. (2025). Effect of Graston technique in patients with cervicogenic headache and myofascial release. Egyptian Journal of Physical Therapy Research, 6(1), 45–53.
Ożóg, P., Weber-Rajek, M., & Radzimińska, A. (2023). Effects of isolated myofascial release therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12.
Patil, D. S., Kale, R., & Deshmukh, P. (2024). Effectiveness of nonpharmacological measures on improving pain and disability in patients with cervicogenic headache. Journal of Clinical Research & Headache, 9(1), 17–25.
Priyanka, D. A. T. (2023). A literature review to find the effectiveness of suboccipital myofascial release technique in reducing cervicogenic headache. International Journal of Scientific Research, 12(4).
Priyanka, R., & Thomas, A. (2023). Efficacy of suboccipital myofascial release in reducing cervicogenic headache: A systematic review. International Journal of Allied Health Sciences, 8(2), 34–42.
Rani, M., & Kaur, J. (2022). Effectiveness of different physiotherapy interventions in the management of cervicogenic headache: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 30(2), 96–104.
Sharma, A., Sharma, A., & Rizvi, M. (2022). Comparing the effect of myofascial release and muscle energy technique on craniovertebral angle and headache in tension-type headache patients. Journal of Physiotherapy Research, 12(3), e4799.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zunaira Samreen, Iqra Waseem, Alishba Mustansar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
