FREQUENCY OF ANISOMETROPIC AMBLYOPIA AMONG CHILDREN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • Sadia Muneer The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Muhammad Hamza The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Rehana Kausar Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Muzamil Fatima The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Usama Elahi The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Author
  • Shah Fahad The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71000/jagpar77

Keywords:

Amblyopia, Anisometropia, Child; Refractive Errors, Visual Acuity. Vision Screening, Visual Impairment

Abstract

Background: Amblyopia is a leading cause of preventable visual impairment in children and remains a major contributor to unilateral visual loss worldwide. It commonly arises from anisometropia, strabismus, or visual stimulus deprivation, with anisometropia recognized as a frequent and often underdiagnosed cause. Delayed identification during the sensitive period of visual development may result in persistent visual deficits, emphasizing the importance of early detection and population-specific data.

Objective: To determine the frequency of anisometropic amblyopia among children aged 5–15 years presenting to tertiary care ophthalmology clinics.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to January 2024 in the Ophthalmology outpatient departments of the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital and LRBT Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 88 children aged 5–15 years were enrolled using a convenience sampling technique. Visual acuity was assessed monocularly using a Snellen chart at 6 meters. Children with visual acuity ≤6/12 in either eye or an interocular difference of ≥2 Snellen lines underwent cycloplegic refraction using 1% cyclopentolate. Bruckner reflex assessment and fundus examination were performed with a direct ophthalmoscope to confirm the diagnosis and exclude organic pathology. Data were recorded on a structured proforma and analyzed descriptively.

Results: Among the 88 participants, 49 were females (55.7%) and 39 were males (44.3%). Anisometropic amblyopia was identified in 68 children (77.3%), followed by strabismic amblyopia in 14 (15.9%) and stimulus deprivation amblyopia in 6 (6.8%). The highest proportion of amblyopia cases was observed in the 8–10-year age group (30.7%). Visual acuity values were distributed as follows: 0.30 in 5 children (5.7%), 0.48 in 21 (23.9%), 0.60 in 22 (25.0%), 0.78 in 22 (25.0%), and 1.00 or less in 18 children (20.5%). Mixed astigmatism (38.6%) and hyperopia (35.2%) were the most frequently associated refractive errors. Moderate and severe amblyopia were each observed in 41 children (46.6%).

Conclusion: Anisometropic amblyopia was the most prevalent form of amblyopia among children aged 5–15 years, particularly in the 8–10-year age group, highlighting the need for early vision screening and timely refractive correction to prevent long-term visual impairment.

Author Biographies

  • Sadia Muneer, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

    The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Muhammad Hamza, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

    The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Rehana Kausar, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

    Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Muzamil Fatima, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

    The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Usama Elahi, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

    The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Shah Fahad, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

    The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

References

Steltman JS, Nordmann M, Sanders D, Asjes-Tydeman WL, Dehpoor T, Tissen I, et al. Baseline characteristics of children in the Early Glasses Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025;263(2):555-63.

Genc CD, Yucel OE. Effects of prematurity and retinopathy of prematurity on refractive errors and biometric optic components in school children: results of a tertiary center from Turkey. Int Ophthalmol. 2023;43(12):4821-30.

Demir U. Evaluation of ocular findings in children with autism spectrum disorder: Observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(29):e43398.

Nanda KD, Sanchez K, Yu J. How does the Surgical Repair of Ptosis Impact Refractive Error? J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2024;74(3):91-4.

Brandt M, Truckenbrod C, Meigen C, Vogel M, Poulain T, Kiess W, et al. Impaired visual acuity caused by uncorrected refractive errors and amblyopia in a German paediatric cohort. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(1):42-52.

Wiecek E, Kosovicheva A, Ahmed Z, Nabasaliza A, Kazlas M, Chan K, et al. Peripheral Binocular Imbalance in Anisometropic and Strabismic Amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024;65(4):36.

Zhou Y, Chen X, Huang X, Li L, Zhu Y, Cai Q, et al. Prevalence and association of uncorrected refractive error among Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2904.

Wu J, Wang N. Prevalence and characteristics of amblyopia, strabismus, and refractive errors among patients aged 3-16 years in Shanghai, China: a hospital-based population study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024;24(1):239.

Meng Z, Fu J, Chen W, Li L, Su H, Dai W, et al. Prevalence of Amblyopia and Associated Risk Factors in Tibetan Grade One Children. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(2):280-9.

Xu Z, Wu Z, Wen Y, Ding M, Sun W, Wang Y, et al. Prevalence of anisometropia and associated factors in Shandong school-aged children. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1072574.

Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Lança C, Emamian MH, Fotouhi A. Prevalence of anisometropia and its associated factors in school-age children. Strabismus. 2024;32(1):1-10.

Hamidi A, Jalalifar S, Atigh SBQ, Darvishi A, Sharif NM, Lashkardoost H, et al. The prevalence of functional amblyopia and its related risk factors in preschool children in North-Eastern Iran. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2024;17(1):59-64.

Sun Y, Zhu B, Li L, Li H, Qiu Y, Wang S, et al. Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive error-related risk factors in preschool children in beijing, China. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):2433.

Khorrami-Nejad M, Akbari MR, Sadeghi M, Masoomian B, Mirmohammadsadeghi A, Khalaf Mohsin M, et al. Refractive features and amblyopia in Duane's Retraction Syndrome: A review of the 582 patients. J Optom. 2024;17(3):100508.

Sachdeva V, Bhattacharya B, Ganatra S, Kekunnaya R. Subnormal visual acuity after compliant amblyopia therapy: residual/refractory amblyopia or co-existing pathology? - a retrospective analysis. Strabismus. 2024;32(1):11-22.

Eslami F, Mohammadi T, Khazaei S. Association Between Anisometropia and Amblyopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2023 Nov 30;10(11):6009-18.

Sen S, Singh P, Saxena R. Management of amblyopia in pediatric patients: Current insights. Eye. 2022 Jan;36(1):44-56.

Meng, Z., Fu, J., Chen, W., Li, L., Su, H., Dai, W., & Yao, Y. (2021). Prevalence of amblyopia and associated risk factors in Tibetan grade one children. Ophthalmic Research, 64(2), 280–289.

Yap, T. & Boon, M. Electrodiagnosis And treatment monitoring of children With refractive amblyopia. Advances In Ophthalmology and Optometry. 2020; 5: 1-24.

Lingham G, Mackey DA, Sanfilippo PG, Mountain J, Hewitt AW, Newnham JP, Yazar S. Influence of prenatal environment and birth parameters on amblyopia, strabismus, and anisometropia. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2020 Apr 1;24(2):74.

Chung YW, Shin SY, Yim HB. Macular superficial vascular density on optical coherence tomography angiography in children with unilateral anisometropic and bilateral hyperopic amblyopia. Scientific Reports. 2023 Aug 8;13(1):12879.

Mostafaie A, Ghojazadeh M, Hosseinifard H, Manaflouyan H, Farhadi F, Taheri N, Pashazadeh F. A systematic review of Amblyopia prevalence among the children of the world. Romanian journal of ophthalmology. 2020 Oct;64(4):342.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15