DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY IN FOCAL BREAST LESIONS KEEPING HISTOPATHOLOGY AS GOLD STANDARD: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/0c760f19Keywords:
ultrasonography, , accuracy, Breast Neoplasms, Diagnostic Imaging, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Sensitivity and Specificity, UltrasonographyAbstract
Background: Breast cancer frequently presents as a focal breast lesion, and accurate non-invasive characterization remains essential to guide clinical decision-making and avoid unnecessary biopsies. Conventional B-mode ultrasonography, although sensitive, has limited specificity, particularly in women with dense breast tissue. Ultrasound elastography evaluates tissue stiffness and has emerged as a promising adjunct technique to improve lesion characterization. Shear wave elastography provides quantitative elasticity measurements, potentially enhancing diagnostic confidence, especially in resource-limited settings where reducing invasive procedures is clinically and economically important.
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography in differentiating benign and malignant focal breast lesions using histopathology as the reference standard.
Methods: A cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on 100 consecutive women presenting with focal breast lesions confirmed on B-mode ultrasound. All participants underwent shear wave elastography prior to tissue diagnosis. Quantitative stiffness measurements were recorded, and lesions were classified as benign or malignant based on predefined elasticity thresholds. Histopathology or fine-needle aspiration cytology served as the gold standard. Diagnostic performance parameters, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy, were calculated. Stratified analyses were performed to assess the influence of age, body mass index, and marital status.
Results: Histopathological examination identified malignant lesions in 31% and benign lesions in 69% of cases. Shear wave elastography categorized 30% of lesions as malignant and 70% as benign. Compared with histopathology, elastography demonstrated a sensitivity of 74.2%, specificity of 89.9%, positive predictive value of 76.7%, negative predictive value of 88.6%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 85.0%. The highest accuracy was observed in women aged 25–40 years (89.7%), followed by those older than 40 years (84.8%) and younger than 25 years (80.0%). Diagnostic accuracy was slightly higher in participants with body mass index ≤25 kg/m² compared with those above this threshold. High specificity was consistently maintained across all subgroups.
Conclusion: Shear wave elastography demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy and high specificity in distinguishing benign from malignant focal breast lesions. Its integration with conventional ultrasonography can enhance diagnostic confidence and support reduction of unnecessary biopsies, particularly in settings with limited resources.
References
Xie X, Zhang Q, Liu S, Ma Y, Liu Y, Xu M, et al. Value of quantitative sound touch elastography of tissues around breast lesions in the evaluation of malignancy. Clin Radiol. 2021;76(1):79.e21-79.e28.
Liu X, Huang YN, Wu YL, Zhu XY, Xie ZM, Li J. The value of quantitative shear wave elastography combined with conventional ultrasound in evaluating and guiding fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph node for early breast cancer: implication for axillary surgical stage. BMC Med Imaging. 2024;24(1):229.
Wang J, Fan H, Zhu Y, Shen C, Qiang B. The value of automated breast volume scanner combined with virtual touch tissue quantification in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: A comparative study with mammography. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(16):e25568.
Abedi M, Sahebi L, Eslami B, Saberi A, Orouji M, Alipour S, et al. Using a combination of superb microvascular imaging and other auxiliary ultrasound techniques to increase the accuracy of gray-scale ultrasound for breast masses. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1):224.
Liu Q, Tang L, Chen M. Ultrasound Strain Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Nomogram Integrating Ki-67 and Ultrasound Features. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(9):2191-201.
Cruz-Ramos JA, Trapero-Corona MI, Valencia-Hernández IA, Gómez-Vargas LA, Toranzo-Delgado MT, Cano-Magaña KR, et al. Strain Elastography Fat-to-Lesion Index Is Associated with Mammography BI-RADS Grading, Biopsy, and Molecular Phenotype in Breast Cancer. Biosensors (Basel). 2024;14(2).
Peker A, Balci P, Basara Akin I, Özgül HA, Aksoy S, Gürel D. Shear-Wave Elastography-Guided Core Needle Biopsy for the Determination of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(6):1183-92.
Tamboli AI, Gadpalliwar AA, Agarwal R, Ukirade CV. Role of elasticity imaging/B-mode imaging ratio in the evaluation of solid breast lesions. SA J Radiol. 2025;29(1):3158.
Wang Y, Tang L, Chen P, Chen M. The Role of a Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis System and Elastography in Reducing Unnecessary Breast Lesion Biopsies. Clin Breast Cancer. 2023;23(3):e112-e21.
Golatta M, Pfob A, Büsch C, Bruckner T, Alwafai Z, Balleyguier C, et al. The Potential of Shear Wave Elastography to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: An International, Diagnostic, Multicenter Trial. Ultraschall Med. 2023;44(2):162-8.
Togawa R, Pfob A, Büsch C, Alwafai Z, Balleyguier C, Clevert DA, et al. Potential of Lesion-to-Fat Elasticity Ratio Measured by Shear Wave Elastography to Reduce Benign Biopsies in BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(8):1729-36.
Reghunath A, Mittal MK, Chintamani C, Prasad R. Novel approach in the evaluation of ultrasound BI-RADS 3 & 4 breast masses with a combination method of elastography & Doppler. Indian J Med Res. 2021;154(2):355-66.
Demirci BÖ MD, Buğdaycı OM, Ertaş G, Şanlı DM, Kaya HM, Arıbal EM. Linear Regression Modeling Based Scoring System to Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies Using Multi-parametric US with Color Doppler and SWE. Acad Radiol. 2023;30 Suppl 2:S143-s53.
Pfob A, Sidey-Gibbons C, Barr RG, Duda V, Alwafai Z, Balleyguier C, et al. Intelligent multi-modal shear wave elastography to reduce unnecessary biopsies in breast cancer diagnosis (INSPiRED 002): a retrospective, international, multicentre analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2022;177:1-14.
Kokubu Y, Yamada K, Tanabe M, Izumori A, Kato C, Horii R, et al. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2021;48(1):63-70.
Tang L, Wang Y, Gong H, Chen M. Elastography Assisted BI-RADS in the Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4a Lesions in China. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(2):453-61.
Wang F, Wang W, Sun N, Ma L, Zhang Q. Diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound strategies in the differentiation of non-mass-like breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound. 2023;51(5):848-56.
Kayadibi Y, Deger E, Kurt SA, Ucar AK, Adaletli I, Ozturk T, et al. The Diagnostic Role of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Evaluation of Suspicious Microcalcifications. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(10):2295-306.
Ng WL, Omar N, Ab Mumin N, Ramli Hamid MT, Vijayananthan A, Rahmat K. Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear Wave Elastography as an Adjunct Tool in Detecting Axillary Lymph Nodes Metastasis. Acad Radiol. 2022;29 Suppl 1:S69-s78.
illai A, Voruganti T, Barr R, Langdon J. Diagnostic accuracy of shear-wave elastography for breast lesion characterization in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022;19(5):625-34.
Goswami R, Sharma MK, Kumar D. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound elastography in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 2025;15(4):802-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Naila Rehman, Syed Muhammad Shahnawaz Hyder, Muhammad Nafees, Sameena Kausar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
