INVITRO EVALUATION OF LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS FOR ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY AND ITS IMPACT ON MAIZE NUTRITIONAL QUALITY

Authors

  • Hafiz Muhammad Imran The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan Author
  • Mubbra Azam The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan Author
  • Anzalna Iqbal Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Javeria Zahid The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan Author
  • Mirza Muhammad Maroof Baig , University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Rameen Fatima Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Tanzeela Iftikhar Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Syed Faseeh ul Hassan Kazmi Kohsar University Murree, Pakistan Author
  • Muhammad Ahmad Afzal Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Nahl Jameel Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author
  • Anam Tariq Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71000/q1ks6b77

Keywords:

Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus flavus, Lactic Acid Bacteria, Maize, Phenols, Probiotics, Zea mays

Abstract

Background: Fungal contamination of food commodities is a persistent global concern, leading to spoilage, discoloration, nutrient degradation, and the production of toxic metabolites that pose serious risks to animal and human health. Among phytopathogenic fungi, Aspergillus flavus is particularly problematic due to its ability to colonize cereal grains and compromise both food safety and nutritional quality. In recent years, lactic acid bacteria have gained attention as eco-friendly alternatives to chemical preservatives because of their antimicrobial properties and their role in improving food quality and stability.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the antifungal and bioprotective potential of Lactobacillus acidophilus against Aspergillus flavus and to assess its impact on the nutritional and antioxidant profile of maize (Zea mays L.) grains.

Methods: The antifungal activity of L. acidophilus against A. flavus was assessed using an agar well diffusion assay. A bioprotection experiment was performed in which maize grains were treated with L. acidophilus culture and subsequently inoculated with A. flavus, followed by a 10-day observation period. Proximate analysis of maize grains was conducted to determine moisture, protein, fat, fiber, and ash contents. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were quantified using spectrophotometric methods. All experiments were performed in triplicate and statistically analyzed.

Results: Lactobacillus acidophilus produced a clear inhibition zone of 30.54 ± 0.32 mm against A. flavus, while no inhibition was observed in the control. In the bioprotection assay, complete suppression of fungal growth was observed on treated maize grains after 10 days, whereas control grains showed visible fungal colonization. Proximate analysis revealed reduced moisture content (20.44 ± 0.45%) and increased protein (8.54 ± 0.87%), fat (2.54 ± 0.65%), fiber (16.87 ± 0.32%), and ash (12.54 ± 0.55%) contents in treated grains compared with controls. Total phenolic content increased to 100.65 mg GAE/g and flavonoid content to 93.44 mg quercetin equivalents/g following bacterial treatment.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrated that Lactobacillus acidophilus is an effective bioprotective agent against Aspergillus flavus, while simultaneously enhancing the nutritional and antioxidant quality of maize grains. This study highlights the promising application of probiotic-based biotechnology as a safe and sustainable strategy for improving cereal grain safety and value.

Author Biographies

  • Hafiz Muhammad Imran, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

    Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  • Mubbra Azam, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

    Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  • Anzalna Iqbal, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Department of Biochemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

  • Javeria Zahid, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

    Department of Zoology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  • Mirza Muhammad Maroof Baig, , University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

    School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

  • Rameen Fatima, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Department of Biochemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

  • Tanzeela Iftikhar, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Institute of Microbiology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

  • Syed Faseeh ul Hassan Kazmi, Kohsar University Murree, Pakistan

    Department of Biotechnology, Kohsar University Murree, Pakistan

  • Muhammad Ahmad Afzal, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

  • Nahl Jameel, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Institute of Microbiology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

  • Anam Tariq, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Department of Biochemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan

References

Ahirwar, N. K., et al. (2020). Effective role of beneficial microbes in achieving the sustainable agriculture and eco-friendly environment development goals: a review. Front. Microbiol, 5: 111-123.

Ayaz, M., et al. (2023). Bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents for plant disease protection: Journey from lab to field, current status, challenges, and global perspectives. Molecules, 28(18): 6735.

El-Baky, N. A., & Amara, A. A. A. F. (2021). Recent approaches towards control of fungal diseases in plants: An updated review. Journal of Fungi, 7(11): 900.

Ito, S., et al. (2020). Chemical reactivities of ortho-quinones produced in living organisms: Fate of quinonoid products formed by tyrosinase and phenoloxidase action on phenols and catechols. International journal of molecular sciences, 21(17): 6080.

Jurczynski, Y., et al. (2024). A review of the most concerning chemical contaminants in drinking water for human health. Sustainability, 16(16): 7107.

Kraft, S., et al. (2021). Mold, mycotoxins and a dysregulated immune system: a combination of concern? International journal of molecular sciences, 22(22): 12269.

Kumar, A., et al. (2021). Aflatoxin contamination in food crops: causes, detection, and management: a review. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 3(1): 17.

Li, D., et al. (2025). Maize kernel nutritional quality—an old challenge for modern breeders. Planta, 261(2): 43.

Ma, M., et al. (2024). Antifungal mechanism of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P10 against Aspergillus niger and its in-situ biopreservative application in Chinese steamed bread. Food Chemistry, 449: 139181.

Mahmoud, L. S. (2025). A summary of secondary metabolites and nanoparticles generated by filamentous fungi and their application in medicine. Bulletin of Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, 2024(4): 19-36.

Mahmoud, Y. A.-G., et al. (2025). Comprehensive review for aflatoxin detoxification with special attention to cold plasma treatment. Mycotoxin Research, 41(2): 277-300.

Meng, F.-B., et al. (2022). Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus acidophilus fermentation on antioxidant activity and metabolomic profiles of loquat juice. Lwt, 171: 114104.

Mesterhazy, A. (2024). Food safety aspects of breeding maize to multi-resistance against the major (Fusarium graminearum, F. verticillioides, Aspergillus flavus) and minor toxigenic fungi (Fusarium spp.) as well as to toxin accumulation, trends, and solutions—A review. Journal of Fungi, 10(1): 40.

Nleya, N., et al. (2021). Biodiversity of aflatoxigenic Aspergillus species in dairy feeds in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. Frontiers in microbiology, 11: 599605.

Pintér, M., et al. (2025). Synthetic Food Preservatives Modulate Apoptotic Gene Expression in HepG2 Cells: Divergent Effects of Sodium Benzoate, Potassium Sorbate, and Sodium Metabisulfite. Nutrients, 17(21): 3466.

Salman, M., et al. (2022). Bioprotection of Zea mays L. from aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus by Loigolactobacillus coryniformis BCH-4. PloS one, 17(8): e0271269.

Salman, M., et al. (2020). In vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Lactobacillus coryniformis BCH-4 bioactive compounds and determination of their bioprotective effects on nutritional components of Maize (Zea mays L.). Molecules, 25(20): 4685.

Tariq, A., et al. (2025). Unveiling the potential of Loigolactobacillus coryniformis BCH-4 to ameliorate drought stress in Zea mays L. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 41(2): 49.

Vajnai, Z., et al. (2025). Utilization of Aflatoxin-B1-Contaminated Corn by Yellow Mealworm Larvae for Common Carp Feed and Assessing Residual Frass Toxicity by Zebrafish Embryo Microinjection. International journal of molecular sciences, 26(20): 9851.

Wu L, Zhou J, Zhou A, Lei Y, Tang L, Hu S, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus ameliorates cholestatic liver injury through inhibiting bile acid synthesis and promoting bile acid excretion. Gut Microbes. 2024;16(1):2390176.

Zhang J, Yang J, Luo J, Wu W, Luo H, Wei W, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus potentiates oncolytic virotherapy through modulating gut microbiota homeostasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):3315.

Lau HC, Zhang X, Ji F, Lin Y, Liang W, Li Q, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus suppresses non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma through producing valeric acid. EBioMedicine. 2024;100:104952.

Beghetti I, Panizza D, Lenzi J, Gori D, Martini S, Corvaglia L, et al. Probiotics for Preventing Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Network Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2021;13(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15