COMPARISON OF POST CESAREAN WOUND INFECTION WITH OR WITHOUT USE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE DURING CESAREAN WOUND CLEANING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/r6gqfd61Keywords:
Iatrogenic Disease, Obesity, Pelvic Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Stents, Ureteral Injuries, UreteroscopyAbstract
Background: Post-cesarean wound infection remains a significant concern, contributing to maternal morbidity and healthcare costs. While normal saline is widely used for wound irrigation, hydrogen peroxide possesses strong antimicrobial and tissue-cleansing properties that may enhance wound healing. Despite its potential benefits, its use in cesarean wound care remains underexplored. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide versus normal saline in reducing post-cesarean wound infections and promoting faster healing.
Objective: To compare the post-cesarean wound infection rate and healing time between hydrogen peroxide and normal saline irrigation during wound cleaning.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, enrolling 204 women undergoing elective or emergency cesarean sections. Participants were randomized into two groups: hydrogen peroxide (Group A, n=102) and normal saline (Group B, n=102). The surgical wound was irrigated with the allocated solution before closure. Wound healing was monitored for four weeks, and infections were defined by clinical criteria. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and logistic regression to compare outcomes.
Results: Faster wound healing (<7 days) was observed in 43.1% of Group A compared to 20.6% of Group B, while delayed healing (>9 days) was more frequent in Group B (28.4%) than in Group A (18.6%) (p=0.0024). Wound infections occurred in 14.7% of Group A and 29.4% of Group B (p=0.0181). Logistic regression confirmed a significant reduction in infection risk with hydrogen peroxide.
Conclusion: Hydrogen peroxide significantly enhances wound healing and reduces post-cesarean wound infections compared to normal saline. Its routine use in cesarean wound care could improve maternal recovery and postoperative outcomes.
References
Lamfel R, Snyman L, Seopela L, Jahn G, Becker P. Early online. S Afr Med J. 2024;114(5):e1081.
Tuuli MG, Liu J, Tita ATN, Longo S, Trudell A, Carter EB, et al. Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2020;324(12):1180-9.
Mackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Berghella V. Evidence-based cesarean delivery: preoperative management (part 7). Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024;6(5):101362.
Farid Mojtahedi M, Sepidarkish M, Almukhtar M, Eslami Y, Mohammadianamiri F, Behzad Moghadam K, et al. Global incidence of surgical site infections following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2023;139:82-92.
Pinho B, Costa A. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines implementation in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;292:201-9.
Ketema DB, Wagnew F, Assemie MA, Ferede A, Alamneh AA, Leshargie CT, et al. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infection following cesarean section in North-west Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):902.
Bizuayew H, Abebe H, Mullu G, Bewuket L, Tsega D, Alemye T. Post-cesarean section surgical site infection and associated factors in East Gojjam zone primary hospitals, Amhara region, North West Ethiopia, 2020. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0261951.
Koirala P, Koirala I, Bajracharya S, Rijal H, Ghimire A, Chamlagain A. Postoperative Surgical Site Infection among Patients with Caesarean Delivery in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2023;61(262):526-30.
Getaneh T, Negesse A, Dessie G. Prevalence of surgical site infection and its associated factors after cesarean section in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):311.
Hamel MS, Tuuli M. Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2023;50(2):327-38.
Ekanem E, Ngene NC, Moodley J, Konje J. Prevention of surgical site infection and sepsis in pregnant obese women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;91:102406.
Guo C, Cheng T, Li J. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy on surgical site infection in obese women after cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;158(3):502-11.
Dellapiana G, Levian C, Gubernick L, Burwick RM. Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics after emergent cesarean delivery and risk of postpartum infection or wound complication. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):6830-5.
Villers MS. Reducing Cesarean Delivery Surgical Site Complications. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020;47(3):429-37.
Ning J, Akhter T, Sarfraz M, Afridi HI, Albasher G, Unar A. The importance of monitoring endocrine-disrupting chemicals and essential elements in biological samples of fertilizer industry workers. Environmental Research. 2023 Aug 15;231:116173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116173
Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2022;400(10365):1767-76.
Hadiati DR, Hakimi M, Nurdiati DS, Masuzawa Y, da Silva Lopes K, Ota E. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;6(6):Cd007462.
Hamel MS, Tuuli MG. Surgical Closing Protocol and Surgical Site Infection After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;139(5):745-7.
Salmanov AG, Vitiuk AD, Ishchak OM, Insarova KS, Chyrva SL, Kuzomenska ML, et al. SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER CESAREAN SECTION IN UKRAINE: RESULTS A MULTICENTER STUDY. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(4):934-9.
Lake ES, Alamrew A, Belay WS, Yilak G, Berihun Erega B, Abita Z, et al. Surgical site infection following cesarean section and its predictors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0296767.
Buzhardt S, Chapple AG, LeMoine F, McCune K, Sutton EF. Surgical site infection risk in cesarean delivery patients with obesity after negative pressure wound therapy: A retrospective cohort study. Surgery. 2021;170(1):153-9.
Ahmed S, Ahmad QM, Akhtar T, Usman M, Al Rehman S, Ayub MR. Incidence of Rifampicin-Resistant Strains in Pediatric Cases Newly Identified with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Annals of Punjab Medical College. 2023 Dec 31;17(4):440-5. https://doi.org/10.29054/apmc/2023.1306
Velin L, Umutesi G, Riviello R, Muwanguzi M, Bebell LM, Yankurije M, et al. Surgical Site Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance After Cesarean Section Delivery in Rural Rwanda. Ann Glob Health. 2021;87(1):77.
Fixler JS. Surgical-site infection in multifetal cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;310(2):1049-53.
Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K, Kimball S. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;4(4):Cd007892.
Al-Kharabsheh R, Ahmad M, Al Soudi M, Al-Ramadneh A. Wound Infection Incidence and Obesity in Elective Cesarean Sections in Jordan. Med Arch. 2021;75(2):138-43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bisma, Haleema Yasmin, Shighraf Iftikhar, Mariam Hyder, Fatima Asghar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
