QUANTIFICATION OF HEAVY METALS IN LAYER & DOMESTIC HEN EGGS: METHODS, GLOBAL OCCURRENCE, EXPOSURE, AND RISK ASSESSMENT (2010–2025): A NARRATIVE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/q18b2907Keywords:
table eggs, layer hens, heavy metals; , Backyard poultry, Food safety, Risk assessmentAbstract
Background: Eggs are an essential component of human diets worldwide, valued for their high-quality proteins, essential fatty acids, vitamins, and minerals. However, concerns are growing about heavy metal (HM) contamination—particularly lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), and copper (Cu)/zinc (Zn). These elements, while some are nutritionally essential, can pose toxicological risks when present in elevated concentrations and may enter eggs through contaminated feed, water, soil, or environmental exposure.
Objective: This narrative review aims to consolidate recent literature (2010–2025) on the occurrence of heavy metals in both commercial and domestic hen eggs, to discuss the factors influencing their transfer and partitioning, to evaluate dietary exposure and associated health risks, and to outline implications for food safety and public health.
Main Discussion Points: Available studies highlight considerable variability in HM contamination across regions and production systems, with domestic and backyard eggs often showing higher Pb and Cd levels than those from regulated commercial farms. Factors such as breed, age, season, housing systems, and feeding practices influence accumulation, with yolk generally exhibiting higher concentrations than albumen, especially for lipophilic compounds like methylmercury. Analytical techniques range from atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) to advanced ICP-MS and speciation methods, though inconsistency in sample preparation, reporting units, and quality assurance limits cross-study comparability. Global occurrence data reveal higher contamination risks in low- and middle-income regions, particularly near industrial zones, while European surveys report comparatively lower levels due to stronger regulatory enforcement.
Conclusion: Despite their nutritional value, eggs can serve as a pathway for human exposure to hazardous metals. The current evidence underscores the need for harmonized analytical protocols, improved surveillance of backyard systems, and greater attention to toxicological speciation. Clinicians should consider egg-related HM exposure in dietary risk assessments, and policymakers must strengthen regulatory standards to safeguard consumer health.
References
Guerrini A, et al. Content of toxic elements (As, Cd, Hg, Pb) in eggs from free-range vs. organic hens. Animals. 2024;14(7):1133.
Drabik A, et al. Ultrasensitive SERS determination of lead in eggs. Analyst. 2024;149(XX):[pagination].
Aendo P, et al. Heavy metal contamination in eggs on poultry farms and duck farms. Environ Geochem Health. 2024;[Epub ahead of print].
Voica C, Iordache AM, Roba C, et al. Elemental profile in chicken egg components and feed by ICP-MS. Foods. 2023;12(22):4185.
Hoseini H, et al. Risk assessment of lead and cadmium in hen eggs. Food Sci Nutr. 2023;11(8):4390–4403.
Abedi F, et al. Trace metals in hen eggs. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195:483.
Zergui A, et al. Heavy metals in eggs and feed. Chem Data Collect. 2023;[Epub ahead of print].
Aljohani ASM, et al. Heavy metal toxicity in poultry: a comprehensive review. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1161354.
Kabeer S, et al. Comparative study of heavy metals in eggs from free-range versus poultry farms. J Food Qual. 2021;2021:6615289.
Hossain A, et al. Heavy metal quantification in chicken meat and eggs: risk assessment of exposure. Food Chem Toxicol. 2024;[Epub ahead of print].
Biswas S, et al. Metals in eggs from environmental exposure contexts: human health implications. Foods. 2025;14(10):1489.
Riggs BM, Suydam IK, Crosier AE, et al. Gavage lead dosing and egg transfer in laying hens. Food Chem Toxicol. 2024;[Epub ahead of print].
Australian National University & UNSW team. Backyard hens’ eggs contain 40 times higher Pb vs. shop eggs (Sydney). Canberra: ANU College of Science and Medicine; 2022.
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food. EFSA J. 2024;22(1):e08488.
Schrenk D, Bignami M, Bodin L, et al. Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food. EFSA J. 2024;22(1):e08488.
Guerrini A, et al. Toxic elements in eggs from large park vs. organic retail eggs. Animals. 2024;14(7):[pagination].
Hoseini H, et al. Lead and cadmium in hen eggs: health risk indices in Iran. Food Sci Nutr. 2023;11(8):[pagination].
Abedi F, et al. Heavy metals in eggs: human health risk assessment. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195:483.
Fakhri Y, et al. Human health risk from metals in eggs: a meta-analysis. J Food Compos Anal. 2022;109:104509.
Zhang L, et al. Transfer of urban soil metals into eggs: exposure modeling from China. Sci Total Environ. 2022;838:156021.
Drabik A, et al. SERS-based trace lead detection in eggs compared with ICP-MS. Analyst. 2024;149(XX):[pagination].
Hossain A, et al. Dietary risk from lead and cadmium in chicken eggs in Bangladesh. Food Chem Toxicol. 2024;[Epub ahead of print].
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): Program overview and benchmark dose guidance. Washington, DC: US EPA; 2022.
Koch W, Czop M, Iłowiecka K, Nawrocka A, Wiącek D. Dietary Intake of Toxic Heavy Metals with Major Groups of Food Products-Results of Analytical Determinations. Nutrients. 2022;14(8).
Kamaly HF, Sharkawy AA. Health risk assessment of metals in chicken meat and liver in Egypt. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195(7):802.
Qin C, Wang X, Du L, Yang L, Jiao Y, Jiang D, et al. Heavy metals in meat products from Shandong, China and risk assessment. Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2024;17(1):56-65.
Hoseini H, Abedi AS, Mohammadi-Nasrabadi F, Salmani Y, Esfarjani F. Risk assessment of lead and cadmium concentrations in hen's eggs using Monte Carlo simulations. Food Sci Nutr. 2023;11(6):2883-94.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Usama Aslam, Esha Aslam, Muhammad Shahbaz (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.





