A COMPARISON OF OUTCOME OF SOFT AND HARD DRESSING AFTER TRANS TIBIAL AMPUTATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/v0j4pt43Keywords:
Trans-tibial amputation, Amputation, Pain, Postoperative care, Prosthesis fitting, Rigid dressing, Wound healingAbstract
Background: Trans-tibial amputation (TTA) is a common surgical procedure performed for trauma, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and severe infections. Postoperative management of the residual limb plays a decisive role in functional recovery and quality of life. Dressings are central to this process, with soft dressings favored for ease of application and wound inspection, while rigid dressings provide compression, reduce edema, and may accelerate healing. However, limited evidence exists comparing the outcomes of these approaches in local healthcare settings.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative outcomes of soft versus hard dressings in patients undergoing trans-tibial amputation.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedic Unit II, Dr. Ruth Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, following institutional review board approval. A total of 108 patients aged 30–60 years, of either gender, undergoing below-knee amputation under vascular or orthopedic services were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group S received soft dressings (n=54) and Group H received hard dressings (n=54). Outcomes assessed included wound healing time, pain, length of hospital stay, time to prosthetic fitting, knee joint contracture, wound infection, and wound dehiscence. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean wound healing time was significantly shorter in the hard dressing group (47.12 ± 19.6 days) compared to the soft dressing group (67.3 ± 30.9 days, p<0.0001). Pain scores were lower in the hard dressing group (4.08 ± 1.09) than in the soft dressing group (5.9 ± 1.1, p<0.0001). Length of hospital stay was reduced for the hard dressing group (9.73 ± 3.3 days) versus the soft dressing group (12.2 ± 3.8 days, p<0.0001). No statistically significant differences were found in time to prosthetic fitting (p=0.089), knee joint contracture (p=0.83), wound infection (p=0.159), or wound dehiscence (p=0.41).
Conclusion: Rigid dressings significantly enhanced wound healing, pain reduction, and shortened hospitalization compared to soft dressings, without increasing the risk of postoperative complications. These findings highlight the clinical benefits of rigid dressings in optimizing early recovery after trans-tibial amputation.
References
Akhtar MA, Hoellwarth JS, Al-Jawazneh S, Lu W, Roberts C, Al Muderis M. Transtibial Osseointegration for Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Case Series of 6 Patients with Minimum 3-Year Follow-up. JB & JS open access. 2021;6(2).
Wijekoon A, Jayawardana S, Milton-Cole R, Chandrathilaka M, Jones A, Cook S, et al. Effectiveness and Equity in Community-Based Rehabilitation on Pain, Physical Function, and Quality of Life After Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;104(9):1484-97.
Kaufman KR, Miller EJ, Deml CM, Sheehan RC, Grabiner MD, Wyatt M, et al. Fall Prevention Training for Service Members With an Amputation or Limb Salvage Following Lower Extremity Trauma. Mil Med. 2024;189(5-6):980-7.
Hoyt BW, Lundy AE, Colantonio DF, Robertson H, Clark DM, Tintle SM, et al. Hounsfield Unit-Calculated Bone Mineral Density Loss Following Combat-Related Lower Extremity Amputations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023;105(22):1786-92.
L BA, Flumignan CD, Trevisani VF, Miranda F, Jr. Interventions for motor rehabilitation in people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;6(6):Cd013711.
Nasri A, Abbasi A, Hadavi Z, Abbasi S, Svoboda Z. Lower-extremity inter-joint coordination variability in active individuals with transtibial amputation and healthy males during gait. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):11668.
Rodriguez-Collazo ER, Oexeman S, Schnack LL. Nerve Decompression and Distal Transtibial Amputation. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2022;39(4):695-704.
Mayer AM, Cates NK, Tefera E, Ragothaman KK, Fan KL, Evans KK, et al. Outcomes in Drainage Ankle Disarticulation vs Guillotine Transtibial Amputation in the Staged Approach to Below-Knee Amputation. Foot Ankle Spec. 2024:19386400241253880.
Aslam A, Shoukat H, Jahan S. Relationship between muscular impairment and psychological health with lower extremity functions in patients with transtibial amputation. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022;72(9):1788-91.
Djafar TE, Stewart JM, Collins JD, Kingsbury TD. Running footstrike pattern effect on lower extremity work in an individual with transtibial amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022;46(6):549-52.
Lathouwers E, Díaz MA, Maricot A, Tassignon B, Cherelle C, Cherelle P, et al. Therapeutic benefits of lower limb prostheses: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):4.
Harrington CJ, Kaplan SA, Richards JT, Smith DG, Souza JM, Potter BK. Transtibial Amputation With Fibulectomy and Fibular Collateral Ligament-Biceps Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Experience. J Orthop Trauma. 2023;37(6):299-303.
Anderson AJ, Hudak YF, Gauthier KA, Muir BC, Aubin PM. Design and Evaluation of a Knee Flexion Assistance Exoskeleton for People with Transtibial Amputation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2022;2022:1-6.
Nguyen HM, Ngoc Le TT, Nguyen AT, Thien Le HN, Pham TT. Biomedical materials for wound dressing: recent advances and applications. RSC advances. 2023;13(8):5509-28.
Tantillo TJ, Klein B, Wilson M, Grewal KS, Bitterman AD, Sgaglione NA. Orthopaedic surgical dressings. Orthoplastic Surgery. 2021;5:9-17.
Namgoong S, Baik S, Han S-K, Son J-W, Kim J-Y. Developing and Establishing a Wound Dressing Team: Experience and Recommendations. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2023;38(21).
Day JD, Dionne CP, James S, Wang H. Determinants of healing and readiness for prosthetic fitting after transtibial amputation: Integrative literature review. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2023;47(1):43-53.
Koonalinthip N, Stonsaovapak C, Vitoonpong T, Jaroenarpornwatana A. Rigid Dressings for Lower Limb Amputees: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports. 2023;11(3):352-66.
Ehlers CF. Integumentary Disorders and Wound Management. Acute Care Physical Therapy: Routledge; 2024. p. 639-80.
Choo YJ, Kim DH, Chang MC. Amputation stump management: A narrative review. World journal of clinical cases. 2022;10(13):3981.
Patil NS, Manoj S. Comparative Analysis of Proximal Humerus Fracture Outcomes with PHILOS Plating Alone and with Autologous Fibular Bone Graft. Frontiers in Health Informatics. 2024:6081-97.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mairajuddin , Syed Muhammad Khalid Karim, Adeel Ahmed Siddiqui, Sunil kumar , Muhammad Noman , Ali Ekram , Junaid khan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
