COMPARISON OF CHANGE IN LUNG COMPLIANCE ON PRESSURE CONTROL AND AIRWAY PRESSURE RELEASE VENTILATION – A RANDOMIZED CROSS-OVER TRIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/v9c1jh66Keywords:
Airway Pressure Release Ventilation; , Blood Gas Analysis, ; Intensive Care Units, Lung Compliance, Oxygenation Index, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Respiratory MechanicsAbstract
Background: Mechanical ventilation is a critical intervention in intensive care units, particularly for patients with impaired lung compliance. Optimizing ventilation requires careful adjustment of modes to preserve alveolar integrity, improve oxygenation, and minimize ventilator-associated injury. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) and Pressure Control Ventilation (PCV) are widely used pressure-based strategies, yet their effects on lung compliance and oxygenation remain debated. Comparative evidence is limited, especially in crossover designs allowing within-patient evaluation of these modes.
Objective: The study aimed to assess changes in lung compliance and oxygenation indices following mechanical ventilation with APRV and PCV, using a randomized cross-over design.
Methods: This randomized cross-over trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical ICU, Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan, from May to December 2021. A total of 70 patients aged 18–85 years requiring mechanical ventilation for >6 hours were included. Ventilation was initiated with Assist-Control Volume Control (AC-VC) mode for baseline measurements, followed by randomization to APRV or PCV in Phase I and cross-over to the alternate mode in Phase II. Data collected included dynamic lung compliance, oxygen index (OI), arterial blood gases, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean airway pressure (MAP), and airway resistance.
Results: Baseline compliance in AC-VC mode was 45.5 mL/cmH₂O/kg (IQR: 32.8–64.2). In Phase I, compliance was significantly higher with APRV at 89.6 mL/cmH₂O/kg (IQR: 62.4–124.7) compared to PCV at 48.2 mL/cmH₂O/kg (IQR: 34.6–68.9). In Phase II, APRV maintained higher compliance at 76.4 mL/cmH₂O/kg (IQR: 55.2–108.6) compared with PCV at 68.3 mL/cmH₂O/kg (IQR: 49.5–92.1). Correlation analysis showed APRV weakly positive in Phase I (r = 0.173, p = 0.322) and Phase II (r = 0.261, p = 0.131), while PCV was moderately negative in Phase I (r = -0.311, p = 0.069) and very weakly negative in Phase II (r = -0.065, p = 0.712). Regression revealed a significant negative association for PCV in Phase I (B = -1.998, p = 0.025). Oxygen index analysis indicated significant improvements with both modes in Phase I, but only APRV sustained improvement in Phase II.
Conclusion: APRV demonstrated more consistent benefits in preserving lung compliance and sustaining oxygenation compared with PCV. These findings support the role of APRV in critically ill patients; however, larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm long-term outcomes and guide individualized ventilation strategies.
References
Ferrando C, Suarez-Sipmann F, Mellado-Artigas R, et al. Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:2200-11.
Rahman S, Singh K, Dhingra S, Charan J, et al. The double burden of the COVID-19 pandemic and polypharmacy on geriatric population–Public health implications. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 2020; 16:1007-22.
Sato R, Hamahata NT, Daoud EG. Prone position and APRV for severe hypoxemia in COVID-19 patients: The role of perfusion. Journal of Mechanical Ventilation. 2020; 1:19-21.
Fredericks AS, Bunker MP, Gliga LA, et al. Airway pressure release ventilation: a review of the evidence, theoretical benefits, and alternative titration strategies. Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine. 2020; 14:245-9.
Joseph DA, Baltazar GA, Jacquez RA, et al. A Pilot Study of Patients With COVID–19-Related Respiratory Failure Utilizing Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV). Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine .2021;1: 3–8.
Daoud EG, Yamasaki K, Sanderson R, Shokry M. Mechanical ventilation modes utilization. An international survey of clinicians. Journal of Mechanical Ventilation. 2021; 2:105-11.
Ge H, Lin L, Xu Y, Xu P, Duan K, Pan Q, Ying K. Airway pressure release ventilation mode improves circulatory and respiratory function in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass, a randomized trial. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021; 12:68-9.
Sun X, Liu Y, Li N, You D, Zhao Y. The safety and efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020; 99.
Mittal A, Kundan M. Egan's fundamentals of respiratory care 12th edition. Journal of Pediatric Critical Care 2021; 8: 306.
Ge H, Lin L, Xu Y, Xu P, Duan K, Ying K. Airway pressure release ventilation mode improves circulatory and respiratory function in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized trial. Frontiers in Physiology 2021; 12: 684-927.
Zumsande S, Thoben C, Dennhardt N, Krauß T, Sümpelmann R, Zimmermann S, et al. Rebounds of sevoflurane concentration during simulated trigger-free pediatric and adult anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23(1):196.
Jahan R, Hossain MM, Hasibuzzaman M, Polash SH, Saha S. Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation Versus Pressure Control Ventilation on Oxygenation and Lung Dynamics of Neonates With Acute Respiratory Failure: A Quasi-experimental Study. Cureus. 2025;17(7):e88924.
Wang J, Zeng J, Zhang C, Zheng W, Huang X, Zhao N, et al. Optimized ventilation strategy for surgery on patients with obesity from the perspective of lung protection: A network meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1032783.
Wang C, Yu Q, Liu Y, Ren Z, Liu Y, Xue L. Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation. Diving Hyperb Med. 2024;54(3):212-6.
Vibha G, Saluja V, Gouri ML, Guresh K, Prashant A, Rakhi M. Efficacy and safety of an open lung ventilation strategy with staircase recruitment followed by comparison on two different modes of ventilation, in moderate ARDS in cirrhosis: A pilot randomized trial. Can J Respir Ther. 2021;57:105-12.
Wang N, Ye Y, Lin H, Sun T, Hu Y, Shu Y, et al. Effects of pressure-controlled ventilation targeting end-inspiratory flow rate on pulmonary complications and inflammation levels in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024;24(1):59.
Tao Y, Ma G, Sun T, Hu Y, Wang N, Ye Y, et al. Effect of target-controlled pressure-controlled ventilation on percutaneous nephrolithotripsy patients under general anesthesia: a retrospective study. Transl Androl Urol. 2023;12(5):727-35.
Sun TT, Chen KX, Tao Y, Zhang GW, Zeng L, Lin M, et al. Effect of flow-optimized pressure control ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) on postoperative pulmonary complications: a consort study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;19(1):425.
Chen Y, Yuan Y, Chang Q, Zhang H, Li F, Chen Z. Continuous estimation of respiratory system compliance and airway resistance during pressure-controlled ventilation without end-inspiration occlusion. BMC Pulm Med. 2024;24(1):249.
Lee JM, Lee SK, Rhim CC, Seo KH, Han M, Kim SY, et al. Comparison of volume-controlled, pressure-controlled, and pressure-controlled volume-guaranteed ventilation during robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the Trendelenburg position. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(17):2728-34.
Gunenc FS, Seyidova İ, Ozbilgin S, Ur K, Hanci V. Comparison of pressure controlled, volume controlled, and volume guaranteed pressure controlled modes in prone position in patients operated for lumbar disc herniation: A randomized trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(6):e37227.
Wang YP, Wei Y, Chen XY, Zhang LX, Zhou M, Wang J. Comparison between pressure-controlled ventilation with volume-guaranteed mode and volume-controlled mode in one-lung ventilation in infants undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Transl Pediatr. 2021;10(10):2514-20.
Spraider P, Putzer G, Breitkopf R, Abram J, Mathis S, Glodny B, et al. A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient - new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021;21(1):145.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iqra Abid, Imran Riasat, Aneeha Alvi, Surraya Shams, Omar Abousaad, Malgorzata Sowa, Nadia Qureshi, Hamza Irfan, Syed Farjad Sultan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
