DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASOUND IN MEASURING ESTIMATED FETAL WEIGHT WITHIN 48 HOURS BEFORE DELIVERY KEEPING THE BABY WEIGHT AT BIRTH AS A GOLD STANDARD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/cncqhm66Keywords:
Birth Weight, Diagnostic Accuracy, Fetal Biometry, Fetal Weight Estimation, Pregnancy Trimester Third, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Weight GainAbstract
Background: Accurate estimation of fetal weight in the third trimester is vital for optimal perinatal care, particularly in identifying low birth weight (LBW) neonates and preventing related complications. Ultrasonography remains a cornerstone in antenatal assessment due to its safety and accessibility, yet the precision of its estimations compared to actual birth weight remains a subject of continued research interest.
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in estimating fetal weight before delivery, using birth weight at delivery as the gold standard.
Methods: This cross-sectional validation study was conducted over six months at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. A total of 265 pregnant women between 29 and 40 weeks of gestation were enrolled using consecutive non-probability sampling. Fetal weight was estimated using ultrasound based on standard biometric parameters. Actual birth weight was recorded within two hours of delivery. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using a 2x2 contingency table. Data were analyzed using SPSS v21.
Results: Of the 265 participants, 92 (34.7%) had low fetal weight on ultrasound, and 96 (36.2%) neonates were confirmed to have low birth weight. The ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 80.21%, specificity of 91.12%, PPV of 83.70%, NPV of 89.02%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 87.17%, demonstrating strong agreement between ultrasound estimates and actual birth weight.
Conclusion: Ultrasound proved to be a reliable tool for fetal weight estimation in late pregnancy, showing high diagnostic accuracy for detecting low birth weight. Its integration into routine obstetric care can enhance prenatal decision-making and neonatal outcomes.
Keywords: Birth Weight, Diagnostic Accuracy, Fetal Biometry, Fetal Weight Estimation, Pregnancy Trimester Third, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Weight Gain.
References
Dagklis T, Papastefanou I, Tsakiridis I, Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G, Athanasiadis A. Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for small-for-gestational-age neonate in early third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;63(4):466-71.
Hurtado I, Bonacina E, Garcia-Manau P, Serrano B, Armengol-Alsina M, Mendoza M, et al. Usefulness of angiogenic factors in prenatal counseling of late-onset fetal growth-restricted and small-for-gestational-age gestations: a prospective observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;308(5):1485-95.
Dall'Asta A, Stampalija T, Mecacci F, Minopoli M, Schera GBL, Cagninelli G, et al. Ultrasound prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(3):342-9.
Zhou J, Xiong Y, Ren Y, Zhang Y, Li X, Yan Y. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography indicates that increased placental blood perfusion during the third trimester is associated with the risk of macrosomia at birth. J Clin Ultrasound. 2021;49(1):12-9.
Martín-Palumbo G, Atanasova VB, Rego Tejeda MT, Antolín Alvarado E, Bartha JL. Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):6721-6.
Krispin E, Dreyfuss E, Fischer O, Wiznitzer A, Hadar E, Bardin R. Significant deviations in sonographic fetal weight estimation: causes and implications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302(6):1339-44.
Xu D, Shen X, Guan H, Zhu Y, Yan M, Wu X. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 33-39 weeks' gestation in China: logistic regression modeling of the contributions of second- and third-trimester ultrasound data and maternal factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):661.
Lopian M, Prasad S, Segal E, Dotan A, Ulusoy CO, Khalil A. Prediction of small-for-gestational age and fetal growth restriction at routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025;65(6):761-70.
Lu J, Jiang J, Zhou Y, Chen Q. Prediction of non-reassuring fetal status and umbilical artery acidosis by the maternal characteristic and ultrasound prior to induction of labor. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):489.
McKenna M, McKenna D, Zhou M, Sonek J, Wiegand S. Prediction of Neonatal Growth Restriction in Fetuses With Gastroschisis by Early Third Trimester Ultrasonography Utilizing Contemporary Birth Weight Percentiles. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(5):997-1005.
Buca D, Liberati M, Rizzo G, Gazzolo D, Chiarelli F, Giannini C, et al. Pre- and postnatal brain hemodynamics in pregnancies at term: correlation with Doppler ultrasound, birthweight, and adverse perinatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(4):713-9.
Robertson K, Vieira M, Impey L. Perinatal outcome of fetuses predicted to be large-for-gestational age on universal third-trimester ultrasound in non-diabetic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;63(1):98-104.
Patel V, Resnick K, Liang C, Smith M, Haghpeykar HS, Mastrobattista JM, et al. Midtrimester Ultrasound Predictors of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(10):2027-31.
Bruno AM, Blue NR, Allshouse AA, Haas DM, Shanks AL, Grobman WA, et al. Marijuana use, fetal growth, and uterine artery Dopplers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):7717-24.
Ruangvutilert P, Uthaipat T, Yaiyiam C, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Incidence of large for gestational age and predictive values of third-trimester ultrasound among pregnant women with false-positive glucose challenge test. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(2):212-6.
van Roekel M, Henrichs J, Franx A, Verhoeven CJ, de Jonge A. Implication of third-trimester screening accuracy for small-for-gestational age and additive value of third-trimester growth-trajectory indicators in predicting severe adverse perinatal outcome in low-risk population: pragmatic secondary analysis of IRIS study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(2):209-18.
Lertvutivivat S, Sunsaneevithayakul P, Ruangvutilert P, Boriboonhirunsarn D. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness between gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;59(5):669-74.
Albaiges G, Papastefanou I, Rodriguez I, Prats P, Echevarria M, Rodriguez MA, et al. External validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for midgestation prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates in Spanish population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(2):202-8.
Regev-Sadeh S, Assaf W, Zehavi A, Cohen N, Lavie O, Zilberlicht A. Evaluation of sonographic and clinical measures in early versus late third trimester for birth weight prediction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025;168(2):774-82.
Duncan JR, Dorsett KM, Aziz MM, Bursac Z, Cleves MA, Talati AJ, et al. Estimated fetal weight and severe neonatal outcomes in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Perinat Med. 2020;48(7):687-93.
Mathewlynn S, Impey L, Ioannou C. Detection of small- and large-for-gestational age using different combinations of prenatal and postnatal charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(3):373-80.
Bonnevier A, Maršál K, Källén K. Detection and clinical outcome of small-for-gestational-age fetuses in the third trimester-A comparison between routine ultrasound examination and examination on indication. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(1):102-10.
Papastefanou I, Thanopoulou V, Dimopoulou S, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate at 36 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(5):612-9.
Devaguru A, Gada S, Potpalle D, Eshwar MD, Purwar D. The Prevalence of Low Birth Weight Among Newborn Babies and Its Associated Maternal Risk Factors: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus.2023;15(5):e38587.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sara Daud, Hina Gul, Ayesha Begum (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
