COMPARISON OF OPERATIVE TIME, POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND CONSUMPTION OF ANALGESIA IN JOEL COHN VERSUS PFANNENSTEIL INCISION FOR LOWER ABDOMINAL CESAREAN SECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/jmgj4902Keywords:
Analgesia, Cesarean Section, Joel-Cohen Incision, Obstetric Surgical Procedures, Pain Measurement, Pfannenstiel Incision, , Postoperative PainAbstract
Background: Cesarean section is one of the most frequently performed major abdominal surgeries worldwide, playing a vital role in ensuring maternal and fetal safety during high-risk deliveries. With rising cesarean rates, optimizing surgical techniques has become increasingly important to improve maternal outcomes. Among the various types of abdominal incisions used, the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel approaches are commonly practiced, each with distinct procedural characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Comparative studies are essential to identify the most efficient and least morbid option for routine obstetric care.
Objective: To compare the Joel Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, and analgesic consumption in women undergoing lower segment cesarean section.
Methods: This randomized experimental study was conducted over 12 months at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lahore General Hospital. A total of 70 women undergoing primary lower segment cesarean section at >37 weeks of gestation were enrolled and randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group A underwent cesarean delivery via Joel-Cohen incision, while Group B received Pfannenstiel incision. Postoperative pain was measured at 6 and 12 hours using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Total analgesic consumption within the first 12 hours was also recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS v23 with a significance level set at p<0.05.
Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the Joel-Cohen group (3.48 ± 0.61 minutes) compared to the Pfannenstiel group (3.97 ± 0.78 minutes; p = 0.005). Pain scores at 6 hours (6.60 ± 0.69 vs. 7.34 ± 0.76; p < 0.001) and 12 hours (2.34 ± 0.48 vs. 3.34 ± 0.64; p < 0.001) were lower in the Joel-Cohen group. Mean analgesic consumption was also reduced (106.28 ± 9.42 mg vs. 125.71 ± 8.84 mg; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The Joel-Cohen incision significantly reduced operative time, postoperative pain, and analgesic requirements compared to the Pfannenstiel incision, indicating its potential as a preferred technique for lower segment cesarean section.
References
Nepali R, Upadhyaya Kafle S, Pradhan T, Dhamala JN. Scar Endometriosis: A Rare Cause of Abdominal Pain. Dermatopathology (Basel). 2022;9(2):158-63.
Guo J, Yang D, Zhang B, Xu X, Yang Z, Zhao Y, et al. The safety of Pfannenstiel incision for specimen extraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024;19(1):1-10.
Güven E, Dura MC, Aktürk H, Güraslan H. Safety of Laparoscopic Entry Points in Patients With a History of Abdominal Surgery: A Research Article. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e47244.
Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Van de Velde M. PROSPECT guideline for elective caesarean section: updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(5):665-80.
Buyukkurt S, Sucu M, Hatipoglu I, Ozlu F, Unlugenc H, Evruke C, et al. Placenta accreta spectrum surgery with the Joel Cohen incision for abdominal access: a single-center experience. Ginekol Pol. 2023.
Soyer-Caliskan C, Celik S, Basbug A, Hatirnaz S, Guclu M, Akbaba E, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta and cesarean section methods. A retrospective comparative multicentric study on two different skin and uterine incision. Ginekol Pol. 2021;92(5):359-64.
Kandemir H, Kirtis E, Bulbul GA, Dogan S, Mendilcioglu I, Sanhal CY, et al. Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Pfannenstiel and Midline Skin Incisions in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: Single-Center Experience. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60(7).
Gadeer R, Baatiah NY, Alageel N, Khaled M. Incidence and Risk Factors of Wound Infection in Women Who Underwent Cesarean Section in 2014 at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah. Cureus. 2020;12(12):e12164.
Özdemir F, Şahin AS, Salihoğlu Z. EVALUATION OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ANATOMY OF TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BEFORE AND AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. Acta Clin Croat. 2022;61(1):3-10.
Cromi A, Laganà AS, Ghezzi F, Valdatta L, Casarin J, Cherubino M. Cosmetic outcomes of skin closure with tissue adhesive or staples in repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;271:112-6.
Baranco N, Zhang J, Khan S, Mastrogiannis D. Comparison between high transverse and low transverse Pfannenstiel skin incisions during cesarean delivery for morbidly obese patients. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2375021.
Tinhofer IE, Tsai TY, Cheong DC, Lin TE, Kuo WL, Huang JJ. Coherences of Cesarean Sectioning Scars and Other Abdominal Scars and Venous Augmentation Using SIEV in Free DIEP Flaps for Breast Reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2025;45(2):e70039.
McCurdy RJ, Harding S, Felder L, Beáta A, Schnatz P, Berghella V. Cohen vs Pfannenstiel cesarean skin incision for body mass index ≥35 kg/m(2): a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024;6(12):101528.
Kaya B, Ozay OE, Ozay AC, Tüten A. Can the Pfannenstiel skin incision length be adjusted according to the fetal head during elective cesarean delivery? Front Surg. 2023;10:1227338.
Almeida LLF, Neves GL, Pinhati MES, Lamaita RM, Cândido EB, da Silva AL. Beyond the cut: a cross-sectional analysis of the long-term clinical and functional impact of cesarean section scars. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025;47.
van den Bosch OFC, Fiset ME, Downey K, Maxwell C, Carvalho JCA. Anesthetic management of patients with class 3 obesity undergoing elective Cesarean delivery: a single-centre historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2023;70(2):202-10.
de Queiroz VKP, da Nóbrega Marinho AM, de Barros GAM. Analgesic effects of a 5% lidocaine patch after cesarean section: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021;73:110328.
Zhang N, Robrahn S, Thornburgh KR, Moon J, Ather MK, Boney CP, et al. Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Case Report and Literature Review of Pfannenstiel Incision Endometrioma. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e66223.
Paramythiotis D, Karlafti E, Tsomidis I, Iraklis G, Malliou P, Karakatsanis A, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2022;41:193.
Rexhepi M, Asani LV, Mulaki L, Koprivnjak K, Azemi M. Abdominal Wall Endometriosis at the Cesarean Section Scar. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2023;44(3):121-6.
Antoine, C., Pimentel, R. N., Reece, E. A. & Oh, C. 2021. Endometrium-free uterine closure technique and abnormal placental implantation in subsequent pregnancies. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 34, 2513-2521.
Basuki, D. R., Nofiyanto, E. & Laksono, R. M. 2022. Multimodal Analgesia Transversus Abdominis Plane Block-Ketorolac Combination being Superior to Paracetamol-Ketorolac as Postoperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section in an Indonesian Hospital. The Open Pain Journal, 15.
Dahlke, J.D., Mendez-Figueroa, H., Maggio, L., Sperling, J.D., Chauhan,S. P.& Rouse, D.J.2020.Thecaseforstandardizingcesareandelivery technique: seeing the forest for the trees. Obstetrics and gynecology, 136, 972.
Dasanayake, D., Jodhi, A., Roomadu, K. & Saumya, G. 2020. Skin closure with Pfannenstiel incision in lower segment caesarean section; comparison of wound outcome with interrupted vs. subcuticular techniques. Galle Medical Journal, 25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Komal Mannan, Sadaf zafar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
