COMPARISON BETWEEN INTERLOCKED INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING VERSUS MIPO IN TIBIA SHAFT FRACTURE IN TERMS OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND NON-UNION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/d1mp6z12Keywords:
Bone plates, Fracture fixation, Intramedullary nailing, Non-union, Pain measurement, Tibial fractures, Visual analogue scaleAbstract
Background: Tibial shaft fractures are among the most frequent long bone fractures, resulting from both low- and high-energy trauma. Due to the tibia’s subcutaneous position and limited soft tissue coverage, these fractures are prone to complications such as infection and non-union. Various fixation methods exist, with interlocked intramedullary nailing (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) being the most widely used. However, the optimal fixation technique remains debated.
Objective: To compare IMN and MIPO in patients with closed tibial shaft fractures regarding postoperative pain and non-union frequency.
Methods: A non-randomized controlled study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, PAEC General Hospital, Islamabad, over 6–9 months. A total of 240 patients aged 18–60 years were included, with 120 treated using IMN (Group A) and 120 using MIPO (Group B). Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at immediate post-op, 3 weeks, and 3 months, while non-union was evaluated radiographically at 6 months. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Independent t-tests compared mean VAS scores, and chi-square tests assessed categorical variables, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
Results: The mean age was 38.5 ± 12.3 years in the IMN group and 40.2 ± 11.8 years in the MIPO group. MIPO demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 3 weeks (4.9 ± 0.8) compared to IMN (5.4 ± 0.9, p = 0.02), though pain levels were similar at 3 months (p = 0.15). Non-union was more frequent with IMN (8.3%) than MIPO (3.3%, p = 0.04). Operative time was slightly longer for MIPO (95 ± 20 minutes) than IMN (85 ± 15 minutes, p = 0.12), with no significant difference in infection rates (p > 0.05). Stratified analysis revealed higher non-union among patients aged >50 years undergoing IMN (12.5% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: MIPO provided superior early postoperative pain relief and lower non-union rates, particularly in elderly patients, while IMN remained a reliable option for simple diaphyseal fractures requiring shorter surgical time. These findings underscore the need for patient-specific fixation strategies to enhance recovery and functional outcomes.
References
Wang F, Zhu X, Dai X, Wang L, Zhong C, Qin J, et al. Ultra-distal tibial fractures: a retrospective comparison of distal plate versus nail fixation. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025;26(1):20.
Walters CL, Simister SK, Tse S, Saade A, Megerian MF, Fitzpatrick EP, et al. Temporary Stabilization of Tibia Fractures: Does External Fixation or Temporary Plate Fixation Result in Better Outcomes? Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):179-84.
Johnson DJ, O'Hara NN, Reider L, Gary JL, Obremskey W, Quinnan SM, et al. Risk factors for infection in severe open tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2024;55(11):111822.
Liu H, Xu W, Xiong Y, Zhang J, Xu Z, Wu J. Retrograde tibial intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive locking plate for extra-articular distal tibial fractures: a comparative and retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):481.
Larsen P, Eriksen CB, Stokholm R, Elsoe R. Results following prolonged recovery show satisfactory functional and patient-reported outcome after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: a prospective 5-year follow-up cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(8):1303-10.
Charak SS, Chib MS, Darokhan M, Jamwal P. Radiation-free Insertion of Interlocked Intramedullary Tibial Nail in Closed Extra-articular Displaced Tibial Shaft Fractures in an Emergency Setup. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2021;23(6):427-31.
Cortez A, Urva M, Haonga B, Donnelley CA, von Kaeppler EP, Roberts HJ, et al. Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing and External Fixation of Open Tibial Fractures: Three to Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(21):1877-85.
Bombah FM, Mohamadou GE, Nana T, Ekani BY, Danwang C, Guifo ML. Outcomes of closed interlocking intramedullary nailing of the tibia without fluoroscopy in resource-limited settings: experience from two hospitals in Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38:87.
Southi BA, Fryer C, Ebert J, Ackland T, Kuster MS, Calvert ND. Kneeling tolerance following intramedullary nailing or plate fixation of uncomplicated distal tibia fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023;109(5):103497.
Stokholm R, Larsen P, Rölfing JD, Petruskevicius J, Rasmussen MK, Skov S, et al. Intramedullary nailing versus external ring fixator for treatment of tibial fractures - a study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Dan Med J. 2023;71(1).
Stokholm R, Larsen P, Rölfing JD, Petruskevicius J, Rasmussen MK, Jensen SS, et al. IntraMedullary nailing Versus EXternal ring fixation for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures (IMVEX): a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. Bone Joint J. 2025;107-b(3):353-61.
Cinats DJ, Viskontas D, Stone T, Perey B, Moola F, Boyer D, et al. Infrapatellar Versus Suprapatellar Nailing for Fractures of the Tibia (INSURT Study): A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2025;39(10):537-41.
Ryan G, Buckley R, Duffy P, Korley R, Martin R, Rondeau K, et al. Fibula-first fixation in same-level distal third tibia and fibula fractures: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2025;33(2):10225536251364177.
Li X, Chen K, Xue H, Cheng J, Yu X. Efficacy comparison between intramedullary nail fixation and plate fixation in distal tibia fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024;19(1):403.
Mahmood A, Subbaraman K, Gadullah M, Hawkes D, Bose D, Fenton P. Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(5):2505-10.
Hutaif M, Issa MAN, Humaid H. Assessing the effectiveness of intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in a low-income setting: a prospective study in Yemen. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024;34(2):995-1002.
Zhao K, Lv H, Zhang C, Wang Z, Hou Z, Chen W, et al. Application of the multiplanar fracture redactor in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nails. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8428.
Radaideh A, Alrawashdeh MA, Al Khateeb AH, Obeidat O, F Abu Tabar MA, Essa SM. Outcomes of treating tibial shaft fractures using intramedullary nailing (IMN) versus minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO). Med Arch. 2022;76(1):55–61.
Tamburini, Zeng F, Neumann D, Jackson C, Mancini M, Block A. A review of tibial shaft fracture fixation methods. Trauma Care. 2023;3(3):202-11.
Wang C, Huang Q, Lu D, Wang Q, Ma T, Zhang K, et al. A clinical comparative study of intramedullary nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for extra-articular distal tibia fractures. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15(3):1996–2005
Zhang X, Liu B, Wang Q, Shang H. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis technique combined with locking compression plates guided by c-arm x-ray machine in treatment of tibial metaphyseal fractures: curative effect and postoperative complications. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38:505–10.
Kang H, Rho JY, Song JK, Choi J, Kwon YS, Choi S, Comparison between intramedullary nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for tibial shaft fractures. Injury 2021;52:1011–1
Kou F, Li T. Effects of intramedullary nailing and internal fixation plates on postoperative wound infection and pain in patients with distal tibia fractures: a meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2023;21(3):e14479
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salman Khan, Shaheen Iqbal, Sarmad Nasir Janjua, Nabeel Anwar , Hafiz Muhammad Noman, Omair Iqbal (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
