ETIOLOGY AND RECONSTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES IN LOWER EYELID DEFECTS: A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL AND AESTHETIC OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/6vwfey12Keywords:
Aesthetic outcomes, Eyelid neoplasms, Eyelid reconstruction, Lid margin, Oculoplastic procedures, Plastic surgery, Surgical outcomes.Abstract
Background: Lower eyelid reconstruction following defects caused by tumor excision, trauma, or thermal injury presents a unique surgical challenge. While anatomical repair is often achieved, long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes remain inconsistent, particularly in cases involving extensive tissue loss. Traditional success metrics frequently overlook factors such as lid contour, margin distinctness, and patient satisfaction, which are essential for a complete recovery. This study aimed to evaluate surgical success using a more inclusive, composite criterion that integrates both functional restoration and aesthetic integrity.
Objective: To evaluate the success rate of lower eyelid reconstruction using composite criteria that reflect both anatomical and aesthetic outcomes at three months postoperatively.
Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences/Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University, Islamabad, from October 2024 to April 2025. A total of 86 adult patients undergoing lower eyelid reconstruction for defects resulting from tumor excision, trauma, or burns were enrolled via non-probability consecutive sampling. Inclusion required a minimum follow-up of three months. Surgical success was defined as achieving at least one of the following at three months: excellent skin color/texture match, properly aligned eyelid margin, or distinct eyelid margin. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0, and binary logistic regression was applied to identify independent predictors of success.
Results: Among the 86 patients, 69 (80.2%) were male, and 46 (53.5%) were aged ≥75 years. Tumor resection was the predominant etiology (76.7%). Large eyelid defects (>75%) were observed in 59.3% of cases. At three months, 52.3% demonstrated excellent skin quality, 79.1% had proper lid alignment, and 14.0% retained excellent margin definition. However, only 25.6% of patients met the composite success criteria. No demographic or clinical variable significantly predicted success (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Despite high rates of anatomical repair, true surgical success incorporating aesthetic and functional benchmarks was achieved in only a minority of cases. These findings highlight the need for long-term, patient-focused evaluation frameworks in eyelid reconstruction.
References
Agarwal S. The critical role of lid and lid margin in ocular surface disorders. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2024 Oct 1;72(10):1385-6.
Georgescu D, Bleys RL. Eyelid and Facial Anatomy. InOculoplastic, Lacrimal and Orbital Surgery: The ESOPRS Textbook: Volume 1 2024 May 1 (pp. 17-30). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Baş Z, Sharpe J, Yaghy A, Zhang Q, Shields CL, Hyman L, Lee AY, Lee CS, Lorch A, Miller JW, Pershing S. Prevalence of and associated factors for eyelid cancer in the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). Ophthalmology Science. 2023 Mar 1;3(1):100227.
Gupta R, Bhaduri A, Desai S, Das S, Menon V. Malignant tumors of the eyelid in India: a multicenter, multizone study on clinicopathologic features and outcomes. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2020 Nov 1;68(11):2466-70.
Kalinova K, Raycheva R, Petrova N, Uchikov P. Acute Management of Deep Periorbital Burns: A 10-Year Review of Experience. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters. 2024 Mar 31;37(1):53.
Nowak-Gospodarowicz I, Rękas M. Predicting factors influencing visual function of the eye in patients with unresolved facial nerve palsy after upper eyelid gold weight loading. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Feb 4;10(4):578.
de Mello Galvani B, de Melo Generoso LA, Silva VJ, Yamada GK, de Amaral VJ, Camargo JS, de Oliveira Belo F, Graciani LS, de Oliveira Cunha P, da Silva IL, Citro GM. Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes in Lower Eyelid Reconstruction. Journal of Medical Science and Evidences. 2024.
Alizadeh Y, Mohammadi-Manesh G, Medghalchi A, Behboudi H, Soltani-Moghadam R, Akbari M, Azaripour E, Kianmehr S, Pour Deylami N, Alizadeh H, Kazemnezhad Leyli E. Epidemiology of Ocular Trauma in Patients Referred to a Tertiary Center in Northern Iran. Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 2024 Apr 10;10(2):126-31.
Bimingo BE, Souleymanou K, Marea NJ, Balkissoua D, Dohvomab DA, Bellab A. Eye trauma: epidemiological, clinical and prognostic aspects at the Garoua Regional Hospital. Open Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021;11(4):259–269.
Mori S, Di Monta G, Marone U, Botti G. Lower eyelid orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flap: a feasible technique for full thickness upper eyelid reconstruction. World Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2021 May;10(2):98.
Miotti G, Zeppieri M, Rodda A, Salati C, Parodi PC. How and when of eyelid reconstruction using autologous transplantation. World Journal of Transplantation. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):175.
Custer PL, Maamari RN, Ho TC, Huecker JB, Couch SM. Lower eyelid margin reconstruction: results of five different techniques. Orbit. 2023 Jul 4;42(4):362-71.
Gąsiorowski K, Gontarz M, Bargiel J, Marecik T, Szczurowski P, Wyszyńska-Pawelec G. Reconstructive Techniques Following Malignant Eyelid Tumour Excision—Our Experience. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024 Oct 14;13(20):6120.
Faenza M, Molle M, Mazzarella V, Antonetti AM, Filosa FG, Pelella T, Nicoletti GF. Functional and aesthetic comparison between grafts and local flaps in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery of the face: a cohort study. JPRAS open. 2024 Dec 1; 42:97-112.
Yan Y, Fu R, Ji Q, Liu C, Yang J, Yin X, Oranges CM, Li Q, Huang RL. Surgical strategies for eyelid defect reconstruction: a review on principles and techniques. Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2022 Aug;11(4):1383-408.
Snee IA, Shah KS, Llaurado LJ, Tom LK. Unmasking Inequality: The Current State of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021 Mar 24:10-97.
Wong CH. Advanced Approach to Asian Lower Blepharoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2023;50(1):121-31.
Wang C, Pu LLQ. Asian Upper Blepharoplasty: A Comprehensive Approach. Clin Plast Surg. 2023;50(1):101-9.
Trinh LN, Grond SE, Gupta A. Dermal Fillers for Tear Trough Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review. Facial Plast Surg. 2022;38(3):228-39.
Xiong T, Wu Y, Ou Y. Double-Eyelid Surgery: a Neglected Mirror Perspective. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46(Suppl 1):205-6.
Liao HT. Lower Eyelid and Midface Rejuvenation: Suborbicularis Oculi Fat Lift. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2021;29(4):497-509.
Bhattacharjee K, Ghosh S, Ugradar S, Azhdam AM. Lower eyelid blepharoplasty: An overview. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(10):2075-83.
Zgolli H, Choura R, Elzarrug HKH, Abdelhedi C, Chebbi A. Management of eyelids' primary malignancies. Libyan J Med. 2023;18(1):2258668.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hafsa Shahab , Abdul Khaliq Malik, Hijab Saeed, Rubia Nawabi , Sanila Ayub, Amber Waqar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
