COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CROSS-FRICTIONAL MASSAGE VERSUS MYOFASCIAL CUPPING THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN

Abstract

Background: Non-specific neck pain is commonly associated with reduced cervical spine range of motion, often implicating the trapezius muscle. Comparative studies on the effectiveness of cross frictional massage and myofascial cupping therapy are limited, particularly in terms of pain relief and mobility improvement.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of cross frictional massage and myofascial cupping therapy in treating non-specific neck pain and enhancing cervical range of motion.

Methods: Thirty participants aged 20 to 40 with non-specific neck pain were randomized into two groups. Group 1 received cross frictional massage, and Group 2 underwent myofascial cupping therapy targeting the trapezius fibers. Assessments of range of motion, pain intensity, and functional impairment were conducted before treatment and 72 hours post-treatment.

Results: Both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in range of motion, pain reduction, and function (p<0.0001), with 95% confidence intervals affirming the efficacy of both modalities. Comparisons of mean differences between groups revealed no significant disparities. However, participants reported greater perceived effectiveness from myofascial cupping therapy.

Conclusion: Cross frictional massage and myofascial cupping therapy both significantly enhance range of motion, alleviate pain, and improve function in individuals with non-specific neck pain, although no significant differences in their effectiveness were statistically evident. Participant feedback favored myofascial cupping therapy for perceived efficiency.