FETAL OUTCOME IN WOMEN WITH PATHOLOGICAL INTRAPARTUM CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL IN KARACHI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71000/pgh5cm02Keywords:
Apgar Score, Cardiotocography, , Fetal Monitoring, Fetal Distress, Neonatal Intensive Care Units, Perinatal Morbidity, Pregnancy OutcomesAbstract
Background: Cardiotocography (CTG) is a cornerstone of intrapartum fetal monitoring and plays a vital role in assessing fetal well-being during labor. Abnormal CTG patterns—such as elevated baseline fetal heart rate, reduced variability, and decelerations—are commonly linked to adverse neonatal outcomes, including low birth weight, decreased 5-minute APGAR scores, increased neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, and perinatal mortality. Despite its widespread use in tertiary care, the effectiveness of CTG relies heavily on accurate and timely interpretation to reduce unnecessary interventions and improve perinatal outcomes.
Objective: To evaluate fetal outcomes associated with pathological intrapartum CTG among term pregnant women at Abbasi Shaheed Hospital, Karachi.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted over six months and included 133 laboring women at term (gestational age ≥37 weeks) with singleton pregnancies and maternal age ranging from 20 to 45 years. CTG was defined as pathological when the baseline fetal heart rate exceeded 170 bpm, variability was less than 5 bpm, or early, prolonged, or late decelerations were observed. All participants underwent standardized corrective interventions, including maternal repositioning and oxygen therapy. Data were collected using structured forms and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Associations between CTG patterns and fetal outcomes were assessed using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
Results: Among 133 patients, 24 (18%) neonates had low birth weight, 33 (25%) had low 5-minute APGAR scores, 13 (10%) required NICU admission, and 4 (3%) experienced in-hospital mortality. The presence of late decelerations was significantly associated with low APGAR scores (p=0.004) and NICU admissions (p=0.012).
Conclusion: Pathological CTG patterns strongly predict adverse neonatal outcomes. Timely recognition and standardized responses can enhance perinatal safety in resource-constrained tertiary care settings.
References
Yadav R, Chawla R, Dhir S, et al. Association of non-reassuring cardiotocography with neonatal outcomes in term pregnancies: A prospective study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(16):2772-2778.
Patel D, Mehta S, Joshi S, et al. Predictive value of cardiotocographic changes for adverse neonatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e036965.
Chauhan SP, Sharma A, Saini N, et al. Correlation between intrapartum cardiotocography and neonatal outcomes: A prospective observational study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(5):1811-1817.
Singh A, Kapoor D, Bhatia R. Intrapartum fetal monitoring: Evaluation of cardiotocographic patterns and their relation to neonatal outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;158(1):57-62.
Mohan R, Gupta R, Verma S, et al. Fetal heart rate monitoring in labor: A contemporary review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020; 2020:6723987.
Khan FA, Ali S, Hussain M, et al. Advanced CTG interpretation and neonatal outcome: A multicenter study. J Perinat Med. 2022;50(4):406-412.
Gupta R, Kumar S, Singh P, et al. A comparison of early and late deceleration patterns in intrapartum fetal monitoring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023; 274:123-127.
Lopez A, Martinez C, Rivera J, et al. Electronic fetal monitoring in labor: Current status and future directions. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(8):1378-1385.
Thomas A, Joseph P, Varghese J, et al. The role of CTG in predicting neonatal acidosis: A prospective analysis. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022;65(3):245-251.
Chen W, Li X, Zhang Q, et al. Fetal outcomes and intrapartum CTG abnormalities: A single-center experience. J Clin Med. 2023;12(1):89.
Nair V, Rajan P, Sood R, et al. Contemporary trends in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: An analysis of neonatal outcomes. J Perinat Med. 2020;40(12):1778-1783.
Singh P, Sharma R, Gupta N, et al. non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracings and perinatal outcome: A prospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021; 45:23-29.
Alam S, Khan M, Malik A, et al. CTG monitoring and neonatal outcomes: A cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(2):520-525.
Fischer K, Meyer H, Schmidt U, et al. Intrapartum CTG and the prediction of neonatal outcome: A multicenter trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022; 266:34-40.
Bhatia R, Mehra S, Dhawan R, et al. The predictive value of computerized CTG analysis for adverse neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(3):411-417.
D'Souza A, Reddy P, Patel N, et al. Accuracy of CTG interpretation in predicting neonatal acidosis: A prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023; 278:81-86.
Wang Y, Sun L, Wu X, et al. Association of pathological CTG with neonatal outcomes: A retrospective analysis. J Clin Neonatol. 2020;9(4):213-219.
Morales M, Sanchez J, Reyes F, et al. Intrapartum CTG abnormalities and neonatal outcomes in term pregnancies. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):e054512.
Lopez J, Hernandez M, Gomez A, et al. Clinical implications of abnormal intrapartum CTG patterns on neonatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(10):2765-2770.
Patel D, Mehta S, Joshi S, et al. Predictive value of computerized CTG analysis for adverse neonatal outcomes. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9): e036965.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ramsha Ashkar, Shabnum Shamim Asim, Syeda Nousheen Tabasum, Sumera Mehmood, Maryam Shahid (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
